buzzykins
buzzykins
buzzykins

Pretty sure that the myth that “vaginal sex” should be painful mainly arose from the fact that most women spent their lifetimes being raped by their husbands (martial rape was only criminalised in the 90s). So you aren’t making a very good argument. And even now, a lot of girls admit that their first sexual

You do not think them capable of any self control, any distinction between reality and imagery?

You bashed me for caring about “straight cis girls” (yours words) getting raped and I’m the one who’s a rape apologist?

I don’t think that men rape because of porn. Rape was a thing long before Internet porn. Rape is caused by a lot of complex societal and biological factors.

I actually read the whole article. Multiple times. Maybe you should read past the second paragraph.

Thank you for saying this. I’m so fucking tired of Jezebel totally skipping the whole thing where women are exploited and degraded and the studies that show things like when men watch porn and then have a conversation with a woman they rate her intelligence lower compared to a control group that watches nothing. In

Maybe they weren’t as far from the Christian Right (or conservatism of any kind) as we want to think. It’s not impossible to be for women’s rights and against miscegenation, let’s say. Or to be pro-suffrage and pro-guns. One’s feminism doesn’t draw a straight line through all one’s other beliefs and pull them into

That was a very strange and long way of saying that you don’t care about female victims of rape.

I’m against any form of domination of women. Which is why I oppose porn. A) the imagery is deeply anti-woman and B) porn is directly linked to sexual trafficking of women and girls.

Just stating my gut instinct. Of course I could be wrong. But porn, like any number of stimuli, plays with your body chemistry as surely as any drug. If people can get addicted to gambling, they can get addicted to porn. Any addiction needs to be fed. I can’t think of one that’s easier to feed today.

So you’re ok with kids consuming media that glorifies violence against women? Don’t you think that misogyny is regressive?

Seriously, even as photography, printing capacity, film and video grew, it took work to gather the stuff, especially to do so in secret. A truly extensive collection required quite a commitment of money and effort. There’s no comparison between the Internet era and anything that preceded it.

Sure, but for the majority of human history, the delivery system was equivalent to an eye dropper. In the last century it became a spigot. In the past 20 years, it’s become a water cannon. I can’t cite any science on this, but I have to believe this makes a difference, and not in a good way.

That context is the patriarchy, not porn.

I want to support this. I really, really do.

*sigh*

Amen. Sick of Jezebel’s blind treatment of this topic and so many others.

Yesh, but, I mean ... have you LOOKED at humanity lately? Something done fucked us all the way up—though “not enough porn” is by far a more likely culprit than “too much porn.”

Jezebel will never support any version of feminism that makes men feel uncomfortable. Advertisers don’t like it, it doesn’t get clicks.

There are plenty of non-puritanical, non-moralizing, feminist critiques of pornography, but for some reason Jezebel only ever chooses to highlight those who oppose it for religious reasons while uncritically promoting it despite being an ostensibly feminist blog. You’re always happy to post stories condemning