Wilmer is a nice kid who is being hung out to dry by the Mets or the media, which is it?

Holy shit! Hey, I narrated this! Thank you so much for posting this, Patricia! I read Kotaku every day and I’m an Executive Producer with Chilling Tales for Dark Nights. To see my two worlds collide like this is a huge but very pleasant surprise. And from one of my favorite Kotaku writers! I cannot even right now.

Because the actions of your QB have helped wrought 500 Days of Kristin.

He’d take that football, turn that sum’bitch sideways, and stick it straight up that ginger’s candy ass.

Roger Goodell: Well, we just really don’t think-

I refuse to change tabs to check the spelling on that name.

From last year’s Raiders WYTS: “As a California transplant living in Maryland, I never expected Raider fans to exist in my new world. One day I was at a bar when a douche Niners fan yelled “Raiders suck!” at me (I was wearing my Raiders hat) and out of nowhere, five cholos came out of the woodwork and attacked this…

For Mark Davis, owning the Raiders is just a side gig.

Nah. He would’ve been too old in 1989 to play a second grader.

And the two rival high schools are (or at least used to be) Robert E. Lee and Andrew Jackson. Probably to be replaced by The South’s Gonna Rise Agin and I Hate Black People.

The waves in that pool are formed by the leprosy and staph fighting it out for supremacy.

I was really supportive of your post yesterday, and you repay me by calling Batman a choad? TRUCE OVER.

Stan Lee screwed over a lot of people. Maybe he was just trying to get something for himself, but he definitely participated in a system that took advantage of people like Jack Kirby.

In truth, my internet typing is simply laziness. I'm an educated individual who mostly spells things properly when it's important. Talking about fucking Spawn on the internet? Maybe not so much.

You've got it backwards, dude. Lee benefits majorly, and the crappy part is, the other creators that aren't making the big bucks either co-created with Lee when coming up with these characters OR almost entirely created the characters without Lee. Still, he takes credit, still, he gets paid. What about the other…

Next time, use Liefeld. He's universally hated.

So, Gaiman created a character in his universe under the Image brand and sued for the rights to said character, and that makes him a 'morally bankrupt idea thief'? If there is more to this please let me know.

You're WRONG. Stan Lee received monies from Cadence up until the 1990s. Then with the movies, Stan gets POINTS on distribution.

I am in the group that thinks Jack Kirby probably did most of the heavy lifting while Stan Lee gets far too much of the credit. Meanwhile Lee gets cameos in Captain America, a character he didn't even create?