You use a lot of exclamation points, my dude. Which is okay! Sometimes.

Where is the ::rollseyes:: emoji?

It’s incredibly fortunate that your personal anecdote is also able to disprove the entire body of contrary evidence.

Think it’s a paraphrase from Zoolander.

Doesn’t make his actual point invalid; you guys aren’t arguing orthography.

:(

But we called him Drumpf for months and look at how far it got us! I’d also like to point out that the Right’s favorites “Obummer” and “O-bozo” did wonders for their perception in the political sphere. We can be there, if we keep it up.

If you can lock it out though... the method of failure would just be to pull you back into starting position. If you can’t lock it out then that’s the same deal.

I guess you’re saying you lock it out and then keel over backwards?

People shouldn’t have to buy car insurance? Disagree.

Is this related to the Laffer curve?

Put your dog on a leash bruh

How old is your kid?

Hunters, if sufficiently motivated, could get one right now. They’re legal, given you file the appropriate paperwork.

Ironically a silencer would make a handgun harder to conceal. Plus you can still *hear* the gun.

I’ve learned that the “cool toy” aspect of guns is one of the most important motivators for gun owners and their Constitutionally Protected hobby. Don’t dare suggest that this thing that they do for fun because they like putting holes in paper targets should be made even a little bit more difficult.

There may be non-criminal reasons... but also if you’re killing intruders often enough that you have to worry about the longterm effects on your hearing then you’re doing something wrong.

Ironically if you actually wanted a silencer you *could* get way by paying a nominal fee and submitting to a federal background check. Keep that in mind the next time someone complains about infringing on the Second Amendment — it’s already restricted and has been since the 30's as far as this stuff is concerned.

lmao both sides are equal lmao “The few who need [healthcare]” vs “The few who need [suppressed weapons]”

I would guess it’s a bad look for the school.

But a loud friend of mine asserted that the wage gap is a myth. How can you account for this apparent inconsistency?