The best response is just this:

I bought a 50-something pack of generic disposable razors from Costco more than a year ago and am still plowing through it. I'm not sure they're fantastic razors, but I don't worry about tossing one after a week.

I'm sorry so many people are being nasty to you in the comments. I can't tell you how you smell over the Internet, but there are certainly a lot of people of Asian origin who do not carry the genes associated with body odor.

What does that have to do with this law? ANYBODY can lie. Anybody can make up a story. I can lie and say I saw Person B shoot the murder victim, when it was really Person A. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't have a law against murder. You could say the same thing about laws against theft or kidnapping or robbery.

I'm feeling insidious motives because you're concern-trolling the hell out of this law and spouting bullshit "law" all over this comment section.

1. District attorneys don't have anything to do with this law. It will be enforced by campus disciplinary authorities. I already explained this, you don't appear to deny it, so you're just spreading bad information.

Because you're holding yourself up as an authority whose opinion people should defer to when you clearly don't understand this law or how it would work.

Well, it's a good thing this isn't a criminal law and is instead the internal laws to be applied in university campus adjudications, not in criminal cases. As such, no district attorney will be touching this law.

If people are confused about what the law says, they should just read it. Here's what it actually says, regarding intoxication and consent. It prohibits sex where: "The complainant was incapacitated due to the influence of drugs, alcohol, or medication, so that the complainant could not understand the fact, nature, or…

That is the problem, right? We don't have a great model for an affirmative consent approach to sex. I don't have a problem with the policy, but passing the law before doing the education seems like the wrong order of operations.

Not only is this a fairly shockingly discriminatory policy, it's a stunning anti-child policy.

Well, that's the crux of the debate. The opponents don't say "no ID from anyone ever," they just don't want to mandate PHOTO ID — that lots of people who don't drive cars, don't fly commercial, and don't cash checks don't have. If someone shows up with a voter identification card without a photo, that's pretty good…

Photo IDs are not required in Alaska and never have been. I'm glad you agree that there is no problem with the Alaska voter ID system.

Glue traps are so much worse than snap traps. Ugh. If you're going to kill them, kill them quickly. Nothing worse than finding a mouse that has chewed two of its legs off. Snap traps just break the spine. And I'd rather have a snap trap close on my finger than step in a glue trap.

Crowing at all hours and raping hens is pretty much the job description for a rooster.

There are more moose stories here than many people probably expected. I'm not surprised.

re: the moose story, Was this during the rut? Like October or so?

It's not how I'd use the terms, but I'm assuming they're references to the colloquial phrases "taking shots" and "putting out fires," i.e., criticism and controversy.

It would all depend on how much salt they're taking in daily. If you're getting a pinch of salt in a glass of water, that's probably better than drinking regular water and eating a bag of potato chips, which plenty of parents let their kids do.

It is a lie! I built a rocket to mars in May, and I could not get any bars on my phone at all! How is she tweeting?!? And also, if she did go to Mars, I am totally complaining to AT&T.