burnerman111
EphemeralHiccurps
burnerman111

Fight believers in hate, entreat those ignorant of other ideas. Just the one isn’t enough.

True enough. I see lots of attacks against your post, but don’t see any yet really attacking the premise. I would add that the gap between where the attacks are aimed and the actual content of the post is that the actual “center of the right” is getting pretty darned close to the extreme right, and the “center of

That’s fair. The police, OTOH, appear to have prioritized identifying and finding this woman instead. Or, to give them the benefit of the doubt, it’s simply taking longer / is more difficult to identify white people from multiple angles and multiple sources of video. Perhaps they look too similar to others in the

Here’s another WTF

Don’t forget leveraging the crap out of the project by taking out loans, then simply not paying three quarters of the contractors (only paying the ones that would break your kneecaps if you tried to wiggle out of paying them), implicitly leaving out maintenance and fuel costs from the signed version of the contracts

When he said the violent alt-left, maybe he was referring to pictures like this?

Are they merging their dataset with other sources, like Yahoo, Google, Facebook, etc.? The additional data from this source might be pretty darned valuable in enhancing those data.

This one was especially unhinged, indeed. It would take quite awhile to list all the false equivalencies, immediate contradictions, unproved allegations and so on... alleging the neo nazis with clubs and helmets and shields were in fact the hypothetical alt-left, conflating slave ownership with becoming secessionist

And to the followup, “... about many sides, all sides...”, his response of “when President Obama...” was cautious about pointing fingers? The point of this panel was to explore reasoning and opinions, not just deal with single yes/no answers. It’s not a poll. False equivalency or dodge, either way. “They’re just

I was referencing NPR in the initial comment in this thread. Why he still gets airtime on CNN is because he generally does answer the question on CNN. He does NOT do that on NPR segments.

He can’t be right or wrong if he doesn’t answer the questions being asked, but instead goes straight to unrelated talking points. He can, however, be a waste of airtime meant to be discussing a particular story. I didn’t ask you if you thought he thinks for himself, I asked you if you thought he answered the

Point —>>> [critical miss]

Specific details matter, obviously.

Follow the money, and pressure the money to stop, generally. The same way one goes about shutting down most organizations, for good or bad.

Indeed. We fought a world war over this. And produced PSAs against it.

Prospective speaker Shiva Ayyadurai: “Some guy asked me to show up and speak, and I’m a famous guy, that happens a lot, so of course I said yes, because I’m a person of color who is conservative, and have experienced racism, from the right and the left, and I was the first to declare that I was running for Congress,

If he actually generally answered questions like his counterparts and erstwhile compatriots do, instead of redirecting to talking points about wholly unrelated topics, sure, that might be an argument. If you think he does that, open your ears, and think for yourself.

Still don’t get why Paris keeps getting airtime on NPR.

Is her mom’s name Martha?