This one was especially unhinged, indeed. It would take quite awhile to list all the false equivalencies, immediate contradictions, unproved allegations and so on... alleging the neo nazis with clubs and helmets and shields were in fact the hypothetical alt-left, conflating slave ownership with becoming secessionist…
EphemeralHiccurps
burnerman111
And to the followup, “... about many sides, all sides...”, his response of “when President Obama...” was cautious about pointing fingers? The point of this panel was to explore reasoning and opinions, not just deal with single yes/no answers. It’s not a poll. False equivalency or dodge, either way. “They’re just…
I was referencing NPR in the initial comment in this thread. Why he still gets airtime on CNN is because he generally does answer the question on CNN. He does NOT do that on NPR segments.
He can’t be right or wrong if he doesn’t answer the questions being asked, but instead goes straight to unrelated talking points. He can, however, be a waste of airtime meant to be discussing a particular story. I didn’t ask you if you thought he thinks for himself, I asked you if you thought he answered the…
Point —>>> [critical miss]
Specific details matter, obviously.
Follow the money, and pressure the money to stop, generally. The same way one goes about shutting down most organizations, for good or bad.
Indeed. We fought a world war over this. And produced PSAs against it.
Prospective speaker Shiva Ayyadurai: “Some guy asked me to show up and speak, and I’m a famous guy, that happens a lot, so of course I said yes, because I’m a person of color who is conservative, and have experienced racism, from the right and the left, and I was the first to declare that I was running for Congress,…
If he actually generally answered questions like his counterparts and erstwhile compatriots do, instead of redirecting to talking points about wholly unrelated topics, sure, that might be an argument. If you think he does that, open your ears, and think for yourself.
Still don’t get why Paris keeps getting airtime on NPR.
Switch out endorsed for denounced, is it still the same?
That low?
What if it was in fact sincere, and she’s a true believer? What if she cannot, in fact, imagine beyond some vague intellectual level of “that must have been bad”, what life was/is like for someone not in her coterie? Like, is she possibly one of those who “don’t see color”?
Did the reporting that Hannity himself had contacts with Russian intelligence during the election cycle get debunked already?
Yay Jackass 2.0!
Watering cattle, for example.
Small point of observation:
Really? What defines comfortable, then, the ability to buy a house every couple of years? Making more than 70% of the people in your county? How about 50%? 90%?