burnerman111
EphemeralHiccurps
burnerman111

I’m personally down to wistful, for exactly the reason in that last sentence. At the time, I consoled myself with the Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex game, which turned out to be pretty similar in gameplay to what I would’ve expected from Ghost.

Are these the same people that tried on air to toast marshmallows with their hands? And then failing that, with plastic forks?

... or Martin Freeman?

In case you’re actually serious about all this...

Especially since this would make Clark her future step-dad, I guess?

I think they meant extort, not blackmail, but could be wrong.

Simply put, the white actors draw more of an audience than Kim and Park.

See also, BBC for a more Euro/UK viewpoint, with a more robust setup than PBS/NPR.

I am constantly amazed by how much apparatchik level spin Paris Dennard puts out when he’s on any of the panels on air. And how evenly split the time given to his response-not-rebuttals compared to the time given to his counterpart’s sometimes rebuttals. If there’s any bias in those, it’s in inviting him on in the

What if their egos is what defines their pride of the country? Political party registration is like sports team fandom, for at least some, right? Only the hardcore fans really care about the actual details of the players, everybody else only cares about winning and losing, and parrot anything else they hear from

Jaime?!

Poor, poor Dinah.

B-Train... hehe *snort*

But will they still vote for everything on his agenda, as they have (mostly) so far?

This is already happening, especially as the “traditional” market money has slowed:

Probably too soon, but... two kids already, he’s very much diminished the notionally positive consequences of winning a Darwin award.

I was legitimately disappointed to find out that Larry the Cable Guy was from Nebraska.

Is this part of the both sides do it, or is this more like the woman who changed her stance to fully supporting Trump because someone called her a name? While I’m not sure if that’s a juvenile and emotional response, or a tribal emotional response, I’m fairly certain in any case it’s not a logical response.

Scary, scarier, scariest... I think the implication is that it is already scary, and that the most scary part for the writer and the most probable audience is that it could happen to them. Which seems fair, as opposed to getting misplaced anger at the messenger’s values.