Barack “80's Republican”* Obama -

I would recommend Robinson’s Current Affairs article on the bigoted JKR (it’s a good read, about 20-30 min) as someone who enjoyed the HP series:

Another example of inspirational leadership of a black woman yet again standing against the tsunami against her (I wonder what proportion of these pro Wall Street democrats are men).

I guess this is the kind of “progressive” we can expect if Biden wins. The overton window has gone so far to the right because of Trump’ America that the above person will truly consider themselves a feminist. Like Anita Hill, I too am left with no choice but to support NotTrump. But it’s still fucking disgusting the…

Your style of writing is a bit confusing to me; I agree with your second paragraph but I’m not sure what to make of the first.

Barack “80's Republican”* Obama -

It’s funny the whole strategy on why the Dems shouldn’t listen to the left because they will get called socialist (if only they were!) ... and then get called that anyway by the Republicans. It’s almost like it’s just an excuse so the dems can capitulate to the right every chance they get to receive funding.

Ah you’ve decided to present yourself like a troll (your racism is showing). I hope your inner pain eases. Take care my sister/brother.

To vote for people who say your opinion is not worth listening to? And nearly always bow to corruption and moneyed interests that you oppose? That’s an abusive relationship.

I don’t count White Feminism as feminism; it just another projection of White Supremacism highlighting its lack of meaningful egalitarianism and class consciousness.

The fucking silence in the comments to the original post is deafening.

Establisment Dems can’t really call themselves left wing if they routinely go argumentum ad populum; leftism has always been against the status quo corruption of power. It was literally what MLK was talking about when he was chastising weak liberals. You can barely call yourself left wing if you won’t campaign…

Clearly my tongue-in-cheek escaped you; the aim was not to replace one supremacism with another which you should have picked up on at least by the end of the second paragraph where I reccommend Saini’s book.

Obligatory hilarious Aamer Rahman vid on Richard Spencer:

We don't live in those other timelines.

[Edit - I apologize in advance if my earnestness comes off as patronising; if you already know what I have posted below then please ignore me]

Because that would require talking about class consiousness and anti-capitalist perspectives. It’s easier to just go with sensationalism than to talk about the endemic destruction of workers’ rights.

“The party depicts itself as champions against global warming, drawing contrasts with Republicans who question the very nature of climate science. But party officials have long feared that a hard-line stance against the industry jeopardized both donations and votes in fossil fuel-producing states such as…

I love the belittling of millenials of the person you are responding to(disclosure: I am one). So let me get this straight:

1. Strengthen the selection process and psychological screening process for police recruits. Police departments are simply a microcosm of the greater society. If your screening standards encourage corrupt and forceful tendencies, you will end up with a larger concentration of these types of individuals;