White liberals love causes like this because it lets them pat themselves on the back without the risk of actually doing something of any substance. It's disgusting.

No, my point, which you (giving you the benefit of doubt) willfully chose to twist by conflating words was that the government doesn’t always intervene when the law is being broken. It may be to prevent a non-violent protest from escalating, it may be to prevent the “armed takeover of a visitor center” that isn’t…

Ah so you think relating and equating are the same thing, huh?Let me ask you if you and your mom are related? And now let me ask you if you're the same?

Well it's a good thing that you're the only person who has made that equation, though you did so while building a straw man.

Actually it is material. This building vs. the Pentagon for example is a very material difference.

I think you answered your own question.

The term feminism has been redefined so many times to fit narrow beliefs. Don't worry, that has also begun with the term racism.

The danger of everything is over-represented on tv, that's why the shows are called dramas and not mundanes.

What are the general ethical standards for journalists with respect to going undercover? This was pretty funny, sure, but it also seems slimy and without purpose.

You shake your head when others don't conform to your values? Aren't you a peach! So progressive! So open-minded!

Dumb people think Affirmative Action is what allows admission for several POCs? Pretty sure that is the stated purpose. We can disagree about its value or righteousness, but let's not pretend it doesn't exist.

Could you show your work on that one? Because it seems that you are drawing a lot from a single question during oral arguments.

All of them, pretty much.

Well there are already all-girls schools while no HBCUs are all-black. And there are all-boys schools, just not at the university level. I don't think it is unreasonable to view the sexes as fundamentally different. I'd rather have a male urologist or proctologist and I don't think that's sexist, it is just about…

I think women's colleges set a precedent that if your exclusions aren't materially harming anyone's educational opportunities then there is at least an argument for permitting such discrimination. I mean, I think it's kind of nice to have special schools for these buffoons. Makes it easy to throw the resume right in…

Federal land? Please explain.

Eh, seems a little patronizing. And there are a lot of university resources available that students (of all shades) don’t take advantage of. At my large state school I was one of the only students that sought out the pre-law advisor, who was able to direct me to low-cost LSAT study materials, which helped me score…

Haha “science”

Only a simple person fails to understand that there are more angles to an issue. If you think stomping your feet the loudest and yelling the most absolute platitudes is constructive, then yes, you are small-minded.

That is a small-minded and simplistic view.