No no no no no. Donna was MORE than a match for Josh. She just didn’t need to get all combative to prove it. Amy was a brat.

Those chubby little hands, right?

The only explanation I could come up with for that was that the U.S. Secret Service hitched themselves up to the front of that car like horses and were pulling it along just out of frame while Prince P. kept it in neutral and just had his hands on the wheel for show.

It’s also attainable if you’re a rich POC. StubHub is very inclusive in that way.

Unaware and effectively another victim (though of a lesser crime). Because it’s not creepy enough without him using the name of his grade-school crush. EEUUGGGH.

This post is a bit confusing, because it mentions only Darrell Cox, who is indeed the focus of the piece, but if you look at the image at the top of the post you can see the company has another AD, Joe Jahraus. As the article itself makes clear, Cox was the main perpetrator, but Jahraus was basically his wingman in…

So the important question here is: because you were both in Vermont, does that mean you automatically favored “Newhart” over “The Bob Newhart Show”? Or are we talking pre-TV stand-up era BN?

Speaking as someone married to an older man, let me just be clear that no one “sexualized” me, as if there were some sort of acting-upon a non-sexual or pre-sexual object. Like Katie Hunt, I am an adult, and already fully sexualized.

But that was all pre-internet, and before Marty was as famous as she is now.

Oh, no—are you OK?

Dart blocking Armond White from Greenberg screenings isn’t really comparable to this situation—that just seems like wise publicist behavior, considering that White had previously said in print that Noah Baumbach’s mother should get a “retroactive abortion.”

Very well could be. (I think also there maybe were some comments I missed, because they were dismissed? Rightfully so, it seems like.)

I think it’s likelier that they were abused themselves and projecting their rage on people who have come out the other end of it. I feel like abusers wouldn’t even recognize themselves in this piece to the extent that they would comment on it.

That original comment (a) wasn’t especially self-pitying at all; and (b) didn’t indicate a lack of willingness to give her mom “leeway.” She’s just not able to be close to her mom/parents, that doesn’t signal a lack of consideration or empathy for her mom’s “own thing.” you can give people plenty of leeway without…

These pictures confused my sense of order in the universe, mainly because she’s wearing fairly big hoop earrings and her hair is wet. Does that mean she was in the ocean with those hoops, which seems kind of silly? Or did she see the photographers and just think “gotta throw on these earrings real quick!” WHAT IS…

That’s so awesome. Thank you for sharing that info!

Oh, is that why Bert is always so cranky with Ernie? Because he’s supposed to be developmentally ahead of him because he’s older?

Absolutely. There’s the financial point where you HAVE to rent, then the financial point where you have the luxury of buying, and then the super exciting financial point where you have the luxury of NOT buying. Not having to buy is truly the ultimate rich-person privilege.

Also, it only made her look worse. She was already being portrayed as the villain in that story, and it made her look even moreso like a powerful rich superstar squashing a poor abandoned wife.

Environmental benefits aside, it’s because: (a) you’re probably NOT going to be sexually assaulted; (b) you actually can get to many places more quickly than you can by car (at least in NYC); and someone else is operating the vehicle, so you can read or pop in your earbuds or otherwise thoroughly tune out in whatever…