Some women do. Some men rape. Some athletes rape. Why are you arguing against points no one is making?

No

So the opportunity to seek consent from a potential intimate partner hasn’t presented itself to you since the Duke lacrosse trial ended?  Or you have some cache of videos of women saying “Yes, I consent to sex with you J. M. LaFleuer” and you think this WOULDN’T give off massive “…asking a lot of questions that are…

Huh? Coercing someone to say it is consensual when it is not is illegal. Raping someone is also illegal. What are you talking about? Yeah, it’s a good tactic that worked for them. So is the mafia bribing witnesses or jurors or intimidating people or whatever. And? All you’ve “added” to the conversation here is that…

Because even consent after is still consent.

It did blow a hole in your entire argument, you just don’t want to admit it. No one said it was definitive, you just want to completely dismiss it the fact that she gave in video a confession that she did in fact give consent.

Like, if she were intent on making a false rape accusation (for.....reasons, I guess), and if she were free to refuse to, why would she agree to let herself be filmed undermining that entire scheme? Why would anyone who was inclined to make a false rape accusation agree to let themselves be filmed saying something…

The jury being “misogynistic and patriarchal” and the jury being an Ohio jury naturally sympathetic to Ohio State football players are not mutually exclusive by any stretch of the imagination.  Not sure why you’re being so dismissive of the former.

Yes, because there’s never been a case of a man raping a woman and threatening/coercing her into saying it was consensual.  What do you think your point is?

yeah, and bribing/threatening jury members worked to keep mafia leaders out of jail.  so fucking what?

While also completely ignoring that she might as very well gave consent

jesus christ fuck off

Feel free to explain.

I’m not sure why her going to the cops right after cuts in favor of her having actually consented, rather than cutting in favor of her “consent,” offered through tears, having been coerced. Whatever I think is “more likely” doesn’t matter, because coercion is a possibility!  There is no reason to treat a video…

Lol, okay, consent is revocable at any time during the act, I think it’s fairly obvious I didn’t mean consent can be revoked 15 years later (just like when someone says abortion on demand at any time, they aren’t saying, like, you can “abort” your two month old), but whatever

Do you think it would be impossible to coerce someone into giving a statement like that?

What about the women you don’t have sex with, and so never record giving their “consent”? By the way, consent is revocable at any time (so unless you have a video of it being offered before AND during the entirety of each and every act, you haven’t necessarily actually protected yourself from a false accusation!

No they haven’t, they’ve proven nothing more than that they can coerce someone into saying something on video after the fact (hint: consent given AFTER sex isn’t really consent!).  I hope all the women you’ve raped have been able to find some modicum of closure.

They almost certainly belong in jail. 

Do you do this, you fucking creep? How in the world do you think this actually protects you from a false rape accusation? It doesn’t for many reasons. A person can always just say they were coerced into the recording. And, guess what, even if you do this unbelievably creepy thing to every woman who debases herself…