buriedaliveopener
BuriedAliveOpener
buriedaliveopener

Give what a rest?  Just pointing out something man, sheesh. 

You should really read a description of this film to see how it is not at all like any joker or Batman movie that has ever existed, how it is a clear parody that poses no threat to the profits WB can squeeze from its outdated IP.

When did everyone turn into giant tattle tales and hall monitors whose primary function is to point out when they think someone else is breaking the rules? This film is a PARODY!! It is a ridiculous, intentionally campy film, that can in no way compete with Warner Brother’s intellectual property (which shouldn’t

This is a parody, FYI

A 15 week abortion ban is incompatible with protection of human life.

Fair use?

Why does it exist, and how would those purposes apply to this particular circumstance? Concepts like “fair use” in copyright law also exist, for a reason.  But in any event, you should educate us. 

Yes, you’re being too cynical. 

https://slate.com/culture/2022/09/peoples-joker-trans-movie-tiff-vera-drew-dc.html

It’s clearly a parody, and from what I’ve read a pretty wild, original, and often incisive one. Whatever copyright protection is supposed to prevent, this ain’t it. But who doesn’t love gratuitously shitting on creative queer people?

The law is you can justifiably kill someone if you are in reasonable fear of imminent serious or lethal harm from that person. The law doesn’t specifically say you can’t kill someone in self defense while they’re sleeping. It seems to be a perfectly plausible application of the law to say that a woman who is

I don’t really agree with “politically powerless,” depending on what you mean by that. 

She was literally above the law. 

I suppose those two things can be true, but I don’t think someone who was literally above the law, who literally had an entire apparatus dedicated to protecting not only her, but her reputation and image, who was head of state, who was provided enormous wealth and luxury from the state, at taxpayer’s expense, can be

who cares whether it was her “job,” whatever that even means?

What was the point of recounting your own personal experience with it, then declaring “It’s not that big a deal,” except to declare that every other patient’s experience must be coextensive of yours?

Shit, I didn’t know you spoke for every single patient!  Why didn’t you say that up top?

Well, besides the fact that she was head of state, and her death dominated the news cycle for days, is leading to people being punished for speaking out against her/the monarchy in a variety of contexts? There’s the land and wealth she gets to have and command, at British taxpayer expense. There is the fact that she

Fair point. It’s just unimportant shit like chemotherapy appointments and things like that that got rescheduled. Nothing important. Who could possibly complain about that?

“I don’t like the Queen, so having a holiday in her honor is bad, so I’ll hold up cancer patients as a reason to not do that”