When someone wears one of my headlines on an airplane and gets kicked off for the words "grotesque anal sex trend" or "wish feet had vaginas for banging?" emblazoned on their chest, I will absolutely refer to it as vulgar. I know what I'm about, son.

I get why we are supposed to think he was/is a douche. What I don't get it why it's ok for an airline to tell you what you are wearing is inappropriate and cause you to miss your flight because of it.

I am kind of surprised at the responses to this article. What I want to say is "Fuck Southwest for trying to be a moral compass of any kind. I don't need a gate agent monitoring my clothing choices for appropriateness". But what I am hoping is that someone will come in and rationally explain to me why it was ok for…

1. Why are you so concerned with how she spends her money? I mean you made a comment about the price, she explained her reasoning, and you're still harping on about it.

It's definitely a good money saving option for those who have the time/patience/access to the needed products, hence why I starred your reply, in case any of the Milliverse want to mix their own. I'm not saying my routine and choices are universal truths for everyone.

Convenience tax. Saves me having to cart the gallons on the train, store them at appropriate temps, finding just the right blend/proportions, and mixing that blend without making a mess :D

This is stupid in Paris, but even worse, it's stupid in towns all over North America where people are randomly turning bridges into giant garbage contraptions for old luggage locks. Tacky.

dunno if the photo has changed but Liverpool wishes that was Liverpool

It is infinitely easier to get an abortion in France than it is most anywhere in the United States.

So when you had an abortion in France you had to have a trans vaginal ultrasound, well then if that is true then it is very rare because I can't find any article about it happening in France just that all of them are from US (even in French).

Because not everyone in Paris is terrible.

You haven't made any points you just said a load of incorrect facts, so no your point does not stand.

Really? I lived in France for years and knew women who got abortions—they weren't that big a deal. First of all, finding a provider wasn't an issue, unlike in the U.S. Also, it was cheap. There were hoops to jump through—which is awful and must stop—but nothing that we don't do here (but no vaginal probing. At…

Seriously, screw the locks bridge. Pont Neuf all the way. It's over 400 years old and survived WWII.

No it isn't seeing as I have had an abortion in France and i saw what my friend had to go through to get an abortion in US, so no it is not "intellectually dishonest". In France they just asked me one question and that was it, i was not distressed at the time i just did not want to keep the foetus. Question have you…

Yeah, but if it's part of their job training, then you have grounds for firing them when they don't do as they are trained to do.

I don't think you understand how it works in France you could only get an abortion if her condition puts her in a situation of distress, due to relaxation of laws in 2001 that could mean anything from saying "I would be distressed if I had this child" etc. Even before it was changed 6 months ago it was still easier…

Futbol is Spanish. In France, its just football again. But yes, France has endemic racism, and like most of Europe, football brings it out very effectively.

On a related note, people who put those locks on bridges are literally endangering the lives of others.

"Find three unrelated witnesses"

So...investigate?