I say this to anyone anytime they complain about any kind of content (and someone always complains about something) so don’t think it’s just you. You could just...stop coming here?

To be fair, I don’t think it has anything to be with democrat republicans as much as, Trump and anyone who is not Trump. I used to be all, respect the office etc. etc. Even during Bush, who I despised. But Trump is a joke and he deserves to be treated as such.

I have never argued with you about the definition of peace. You’re straight up making things up in order to have something to argue with me about.

Oh no, Iiii’m not letting you get away with that shit. You’re not catching me slippin! Okay... let me quote you once again.

I’m not an American, stupid.

Oh also the other thing that made me suspect you’re a troll. You keep arguing with me about the definition of peace when I keep saying I agree with you lol. Should I bring out the receipts for that one too? Lawd have mercy smh

Okay, so now let us address the ridiculously, absurdly naive, fantastical, and childish proposition you just threw at me. I know it’s hard for you as an American to imagine this, so let’s imagine that you are not American. Let’s say you live in a village in, I don’t know, somewhere in the Middle East or Africa. And…

I’m still not sure if you’re joking, but okay I’ll play along.

Wait are you serious? Or are you trolling me? Honest question because I mean look, I get it. Can’t say I haven’t done it myself, but I’m actually a really busy person. I’m in the middle of something dude, and I’m taking time out of my day and trying to be like, genuine with somebody on the internet right now and it’s…

To clarify, yes I’m for morality that’s why I’m bothering to have this conversation. Because I think, or thought (idk now), you might enlighten me on my views on morality or at least help me to grapple with them. But I’m just not a moral absolutist, a position I associate with religion (hence why I first, initially,…

I am directly addressing your question. You keep coming back to the religion thing so I keep having to address it. I just used religion to demonstrate an example. You decided to fixate on it and ask me a direct question about it so now, we have to talk about it.

What you demonstrate is you’re not reading me. I’m not rambling, everything I bring up is used as an example to demonstrate the question. Please, show me a place where I have been rambling, I will demonstrate to you how it is pertinent to the question at hand. And I’ve thought about this a lot. And, the millionth time…

If you don’t think there’s no morality without god, why do you keep bringing up religious doctrine to justify morality?

You can avoid killing anyone by not killing anyone. If someone does kill someone, you didn’t kill them by not killing the first person

I didn’t say you didn’t have an argument. I said “what I don’t have is an argument.” Which are two different things. You’ve been misreading me, because you’re mad and I get it. I get why.

Why are you always so hostile? You want people to kill people! I’d say that’s considerably more hostile than arguing on the internet.

Right, you did make an argument, but recall I said “but is it enough?” I think the argument is not convincing, though it could be. I think there is something to this idea, but you haven’t developed it. I don’t think you have given me an argument as much as an intuitive idea that resonated with me. It’s like, you began…

Why are you always so hostile? I’m trying to have a civil conversation with you that I think might help me to understand.

But that’s the problem. We haven’t been through it. You’ve told me your opinion, yes, but that does not give me any reason to change mine. What I am missing is an argument.

Perhaps, but doing nothing also certainly involved a lot of people being killed. So given the choice between doing nothing and intervening and at least trying to save the lives of people who are being raped and killed, I stand for intervention.