bubblegumcrisis
Trouble
bubblegumcrisis

Perhaps, both are idiots? I mean, regardless of what happened in the primaries, she was our nominee, and it was her vs. trump, and a lot of people chose either trump or stay home or someone else, and those people are idiots.

I think what’s happening there is that you’re seeing so much photoshop you have lost your ability to distinguish between what is real and what isn’t.

his shot from today’s All-Star Celebrity Shootout of Chris Pronger drilling Justin Bieber is amazing

I don’t know about gameplay I think the game was just way too easy and that has been my disappointment with it (playing through it right now, almost done). I’m not even a good gamer. Okay no let me take that back. I suck at video games lol. And even I found it to be way too easy on Death March. Like all I have to do

Gotcha. Makes sense.

But again, whatever the arguments in the piece, you are proceeding from the assumption that Derrida is in fact a non-intentionalist, in the sense that his argument relies on the assumption that we can read a text’s meaning independent of an intention by an author. This is not at all the case. Again, I’m not sure where

But the joke reviews are my favorite ones...

Rather than getting into the weeds of those essays, I’ll say a few words about deconstruction in general that should circumvent any need for it. First, Derrida is not a non-intentionalist, in the sense I take you to be using that term. He doesn’t argue that you shouldn’t read a text to get the meaning of that text the

I did consider that and I believe that’s largely the intent. But I’m always more interested in what the game communicates than what the writers/designers intended.

Have one back for recognizing it. Big up Nas

She was walking to the Trump Inauguration ball. She was already a Trump supporter. We know both from the very first sentence quoted. So we know what this egg was about, Trump.  Now let’s jump to the last paragraph.

Don’t worry Daniel, I got what you were trying to say.

lmao It needed to be said.

I respect a lot of police officers in my community, people I see out here serving, doing good work. I love and treasure those officers, those many good cops, who go above and beyond the call of duty, in many ways both small and large. But as for the bad cops? Nope, sorry. They get no respect. A bully is a bully is a

If that is what the person I was responding to meant by that, then I simply misunderstood. But judging by the comment they were responding to, I don’t think that’s what they were saying. But could be wrong.

Again, I was not responding to the article. I was responding specifically to the comment made by cesariojpn that there are, and I quote, “shitheads that ruin it for everyone else.” The idea that if there are people that abuse the system, it somehow ruins it for everyone else, or that it should, or that this is only

Of course. And that would be my take on it too. But the conspiracy OP was referring to, or at least what I assume they were, is the idea that all or a majority of people on welfare are doing this, or that they are just lazy and don’t want to do anything for themselves because the government is giving them all this

I know nothing about it, and was referring specifically to the American beliefs about Welfare, which is why I mentioned the general American population. Having a knowledge of what it is like to be poor though, having been poor myself, I happen to suspect that it is no different anywhere, that being poor sucks whether

There are always gonna be shitheads in every group. Lord knows we have our fair share among the general American population. It doesn’t make it any less of an insane conspiracy just because some are shitheads and it doesn’t make anyone any less of an asshole for believing and propagating said conspiracy.

It didn’t have buzz just in Japan though.