"Thod"

'Get busy livin', or get busy Raven'

Now in these scenarios, are we talking about people who fuck pizzas, or are the pizzas of the people-fucking variety? Please respond, this is very relevant to certain…interests of mine.

All I want is for the finale to end on Morgan Freeman reading the line: "It truly was so Raven"

How about we compromise on Charlie Brown with cornrows and dashiki

I'd watch it.

By 'heroin', do you mean 'anonymous Craigslist blowies'?

God, that poster had my adolescent mind afire with all the possibilities.

I get the cathartic angle, for sure. I'm a longtime connoisseur of the gorier genres, being able to compartmentalize those bodily anxieties on a screen is totally part of the whole shtick.

Which is kinda fucked, right? Of all the things to consider scary, 'Violence' seems like it would sensibly be high on the list.

Rivethead is an excellent read, and is part of why I give Moore some leeway; even though I think he is himself more than a bit of a blowhard, he's sincere about the Message, and has been willing to stump for better-qualified speakers.

I wish I could be the charismatic bad guy exuding lived-in malevolence all over the place.

Finally, a terror warning system that makes intuitive sense.

"Yuge"

If you don't want something to be shared on the internet, don't share it yourself

Both consented to share the images with anonymous strangers: can they really complain or expect the law to intervene when anonymous strangers share it further, as though that was not the expectation during the initial instance of…

From a practical level, I agree. The laws are still necessary, and functional for the broad majority of cases when properly enforced.

Question, mostly just as a theoretical parameter for such a law, not necessarily because I think it's a huge dealbreaker: can that consent be revoked or modified after the fact, and to what extent?

Flash Fact:

I think "[Person] is jealous of Hugh Jackman" might just be a generally true statement.

Rush, Spirit of Radio