You’re right. The body of the article is pretty much the opposite of the title. In this case, I feel the senior reporter went to far. Thus my rant specifically to the author in my first post on this article.

People are allowed to disagree, and I’m a progressive that calls this out as well. Just because someone speaks up about something does not make them “the enemy.” It’s possible I’m not familiar with the post history, but it’s a huge problem President Obama pointed out. This insane “purity” demand that everyone must…

Why should they not? They said the law is disgusting, but they are right. Outright lying that the law is about killing transgender kids is outright dishonest. The main point of the reply is spot on: this kind of nonsense damages progressive causes. Stick to the reality, stick to how disgusting it is, but don’t lie. …

My point is all about the title of the article and nothing else. If you think that the title of the article is OK and accurate then argue that point.

Fuck this entire post. Dude is a PoS who has signed into law other vile bills, but what he said was an incredible rebuke of this vile bill and a statement of support for the trans community. This snarky post helps no one except your smug attitude.

Where is the part where they want trans kids to die?

You said that their abuses invalidate their claims about US violations. You said it was whataboutism. You said it wasn’t whataboutism for the US to point out abuses in China.

That’s great. I feel like we’ve reached a point where being apolitical, or at least claiming to be apolitical, is itself a political position the belies a degree of privilege and perhaps even callousness.  

Nobody is falling for their bullshit. Everybody knows clearly what they are doing.
That said, it might be time for y’all to sit down and shut up, and actually clean your house. Have other people do the talking. Because you’ll just keep getting that kind of response, and nothing will change anywhere.

He knows a lot about empowering women through career-ending internships.

A better question is why Bill Clinton wasn't tried and executed for War Crimes. 

It’s weird, but it’s the least weird part of this whole story. Law enforcement should have been on the job of “decoding” what’s really up here a decade ago, but when you have political power in Florida, and are the weird and generally incompetent son of a multi millionaire FL senator, law enforcement stands down from…

Actually, I’m told in gay parlance “son” is the correct term. The older man in a gay May-December relationship is the “daddy,” which is obviously just a shortened version of the term “sugar daddy.” And the younger one is the “son.”

This is exactly my thought process.

The headline “screw space” may be a tad hyperbolic - though no more so than “I am accumulating resources to spread the light of consciousness to the stars” - but the sentiment is understandable.

A lot of the technology that allows the Green New Deal to even be imagined were developed over the course of working on space and aviation programs. This includes solar cell improvements, GPS that allows for a ton of efficiencies and accuracies that cut waste, leaps in computer and computational sciences, communication…

Mars is not, and will never be, habitable. This is a stupid vanity project to obscure the real purpose SpaceX: fat government contracts and weapons delivery. Jesus fuck, his followers are rubes.

It all stinks of trump’s “Space Force”, and like anything stinking of trump, should be shown the door.  I agree with Bernie on this.

Elon and Bezos intentionally miss the point because it makes them look like assholes.

What is the requirement for being a trans athlete anyway? Just the athlete’s say so?

What does it mean to be trans, anyway? What change is being made? How can anyone tell? Certainly, today’s Western culture is unisex in attire, hair, mannerisms.