It’s tricky to claim he fit the description of the shooter if there was no shooter.

Did someone call in and say “a giant black man fired a gun”? In that case, he would fit a description. If not, and he was tackled because he was a giant black man running from a dangerous scene, then he fits something else, and we have a problem.

Fit the description of what? The police didn’t even know what happened.

“I swear: I have no idea how those steroids got into my cocaine!” -Jon Jones

That’s nobody’s business but the Turks

Devers delights denizens, dutifully delivers dingers, defense and depth...

In our very similar situation, where we went through three trainers and an ineffective months-long Prozac treatment, our vet would up being the key. He pointed us at CBD, which helped to lower our dog’s extreme baseline anxiety level to the point where we could establish a basic daily schedule and extend his attention…

Great story and nice to hear how you stuck it out. Hats off to you.

1) This isn’t a free speech issue. The government isn’t preventing them from speaking.

The right to free speech is between you and the government. Not your employer.

I’m honestly not sure this should be categorized as “outing”, as these men voluntarily and proudly went out in public with uncovered faces to a white supremacist rally that they knew would draw many people with cameras that would photograph them. They weren’t hiding in their basements posting to secret internet…

Seriously. Do I need to post this every day?

The government isn’t censoring their right to free speech—hell the government is condoning it. So free speech, check!

Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

1) Your right to free speech ends where my nose begins. You can say whatever hurtful shit you want and the law protects you from government retribution.

They weren’t “in.” They showed up, provided their own (torch) lighting, and were photographed.

The government did not deprive them of their jobs. This is not a 1st amendment issue.

your right to free speech, contrary to what many many many idiots in this country have somehow NEVER learned, does not mean right to say whatever you want and then be shocked that there are consequences for it that AREN’T just “you can’t say that.”

The right to free speech protects these people against being arrested for expressing their beliefs. It does not protect their jobs and it does not protect them from any consequences other than being arrested.