brooksrobinsonsglove
BrooksRobinsonsGlove
brooksrobinsonsglove

Yup. Like, if you believe a woman should be able to control her own body, the fact that you could take the baby OUT at that point means that killing it while still inside isn’t about the woman’s body, it’s about killing the child. Want to have a c section and put your baby up for adoption? Fine. Want to kill your

Its. MIS. LEADING.

Other potential titles:
Woman has Abortion At 32 weeks after learning child will not live.
Woman makes hard decision to abort child after 32 weeks of genetic testing.
Woman Aborts a child due to extremely rare situation.

Most abortions are at 8 weeks. Most do not cost $25,000 or put you through this

You’re correct that Rose’s record is due in part to longevity, but Rose played at a high level for most of that time. He didn’t just merely show up and play. And he did win an MVP award.

Yeah, I think I agree with you for the most part.

It’s okay to disagree. It’s not okay to tell someone to fuck off without any provocation, and it’s especially not okay that this “fuck off” comes from an author on the site... let alone two.

That doesn’t make it right. It was a terribly unprofessional thing to do, the other guy had enough tact to apologize for his post, are you a big enough person to do the same?

The headline IS clickbait. There’s about 72 thousand other titles you could have used. I had the same reaction and wanted to know why so I read it.

And....that makes your response right? You were completely unprofessional and disrespectul to your reader. You really, really could have made a better choice in the way you responded. Take the high road? I’ll think twice about reading any of your stories now.

You’re very professional and have a bright future in journalism.

I can see how some people might see it as a horrific title, because it could be interpreted as exploitation. The title is somewhat cold and clinical, and that often leads things open to a degree of interpretation. This woman underwent a series of terrible events, and in a way the title of the article doesn’t draw any

And yet another mature response from an author on the site. My god, I thought commenting was supposed to be about discussion and debate and all I get is slammed. How many times do I have to say that I realize now that I used the wrong words to describe what I meant and realize that it came across completely

There was no need to further explain yourself. The title of the article is totally clickbait.

So Ben Roethlisberger didn’t explicitly say no, and Donald Trump took that as a yes? Interesting…

This gif is high art. That look straight into the camera is the gaze of a completely broken man. A man who knows every Thanksgiving dinner for the next decade will be nothing but “Peyton this” and “Peyton that” while Eli glumly pushes his mashed potatoes around.

Personally, I prefer the guessing.

Barry’s got him there....he called him a smart guy, but like, sarcastically.

“Well, you can’t just lock up all of them. It would be too obvious.” - Ferguson Police Department

Are we allowed to be excited yet? I have a two year old daughter and this is just such a huge thing for her generation. She gets to grow up knowing you don’t have to be a white male to be president.

Had forgotten about that, fair enough.

In a general sense, it’s abhorrent that someone could commit this crime and not automatically get life without parole. But I have a feeling that any parole board 25 years from now would take one look at the crimes and slam the “rejected” stamp on his application so hard it would break the table in half.