Why does anyone install the app and not simply bookmark the site as an icon on the phone home screen? Genuine question - wondering what the app does that a shortcut to the site wouldn't, other than add overhead.
cjc
brnpttm
Yeah, bad Prezis are terrible.
Tell me about. We had a bunch of students in business school who decided to use Prezi for every...damn...presentation.
At my weight, height and body type I need about 1800 cals daily to maintain my weight. If I want to gain, then I eat more. In order to lose weight (my target weight will be 165), I need to eat at a -500 calorie deficit to lose approx 1-2 lbs a week. That brings me to around 1300 cals daily. So I eat around 1250…
I love that they specified cocaine in that one. They knew people would ask what that guy was on.
This sounds really simple and delicious. I love sweet potatoes, but most of the recipes I come across that include them are pretty complicated (well, for me). But I did make a sweet potato soup that was time-consuming but tasty.
My girlfriend makes something very similar to this and it's delicious. But she uses white beans adds a few sliced up sausages as well.
Love this. I know you say to taste, but I don't trust myself: do you mind giving approximate measurements you use for the spices?
OneDrive.
It's my most used Microsoft app on Android and iOS. OneNote is next, others are not that useful for my personal needs.
That's terrible advice to give across the board. Many people, sure, have to pay for it. But if you can avoid doing so, you owe it to yourself and your wallet to see if you can save the money. Why would you advise everyone to never explore the option?
I'm a big fan of not spending a boatload of money on data, but going 100% data free seems a bit risky to me. I have wifi at home and work, which covers 95% of my time, (and I can use it to download files and podcasts to have on the go), but even for using Google Maps and Gmail in a pinch, I like having SOME data.…
I would add that these diets also eliminate processed sugar
Oh man does that sound like a drool-worth meal.
That's Michael Pollan's mantra, but they're both pretty great.
The mouse-over text sums it up nicely:
The other one I like is "Correlation does not imply DIRECT causation" When things are correlated, it suggests that there is a causal chain connecting them, just not that A causes B directly. I teach this to my statistics students, and they have no problem understanding it, but have met plenty of other faculty (who…
Your overall point is good. It is easy to over interpret the accuracy of results coming from Datasets with n very large when in practice there comes a point where inaccuracies due to model assumptions and data quality swamp the variance die to sampling (big data take note).
A common mistake is to label as irrelevant any research that doesn't establish causation or isn't complete enough to be applied to everyday life. A study that only establishes correlation can be a starting point for future research that may eventually establish causation
Agreed - especially since a single study can't really prove causation: All you say is, here are these things we found together, and in theory, here's what we think is the causal link.