brianwadley
FTroop
brianwadley

That was the best thing I’ve read in months.

Glorious, other than Phryne would be in her 50’s by the late 1940s and I’d bet her story is a bit different then.

The quote was “awfully vanilla” where awful was not meant as a reference to the quality of the work, but to the extremeness of the “vanilla” sentiment. From the context, we have no idea what the author thought of the quality of the art, just the tone.

Oh please please please let the new companion be Zygosgood or whatever the new Osgood is.

“But what is they’re real and that movie is a documentary an historical document.”

Thank you for reading and responding! I love to see the fullness of the IO9 community and when creators comment.

She was in the very last episode of Season 2...

With a few notable exception, ie. SOCAL, this looks like a population density map to me.

Fiero?

We need year-round SHIELD action. AoS, Carter to winter fill and a summer fill.

I completely forgot about that scene. I must go rewatch...just excellent.

You forgot Coulson.

Yay!!!!! Fanboy Squeeing happening here.

In eLearning Design the debates are between content authoring tools (Storyline vs Captivate vs Lectora...spoiler alert...Storyline 2 is the best) and evaluation methods (Kirkpatrick’s 4 Levels or Kaufman’s 5 Levels...it doesn’t really matter).

Ran when parked. I DO NOT need help selling. No tire-kickers, lowballers or time-wasters. Accepting cash and trades (things that go pew-pew).

As far as The Last Man on Earth goes...I really liked the first two episodes, but ever since he reintroduced us to "sleezy sit-com guy" it has been too painful. I just gave up about 8 minutes into episode 6. I'm done.

The thigh-high boots seem too restrictive for movement. I'd have preferred the back to end at the knee. I think the front could go above for extra protection or for visual effect, but not too much. As for the rest, I really like it. I'm guessing that the gauntlet spikes recede...so I'm fine with them. Overall,

Continuing to prove your love of all things pedantic...yes, that is inductive. I chose a "deductive reasoning" approach that looks at the general information and works towards the specific. It's a powerful tool for solving these kinds of problems.

Except that observation proves that the list has 10 items in it. By the time you have finished reading the list, the statement in item #1 is not longer guaranteed to represent itself. To solve this puzzle, you have to take into account a full list of 10 statements.