brensweets
brensweets
brensweets

You honestly cannot be defending your unforgivably stupid position still, can you? Google is very, very easy to work. Passengers are a rather small % of an airliner's total take off weight, and when one considers that they are evenly spread throughout the plane... yeah. This isn't even a very difficult issue that

I thought it was mostly good... but also kind of a mess. All of the scenes regarding Peter's father and parents were just completely unnecessary, and the larger OsCorp conspiracy seems like a convoluted mess.

Are you really asking how/why a few hundred humans (300 passengers X an average weight of let's say... 160 lbs = 24 tons) weigh less than a fully loaded cargo plane? Maybe if all 300 crowded onto the last row it'd have some impact, but that's literally impossible. Google isn't that hard, champ. Maybe visit non-gun

Oh yes, I wanted to see if you were actually stupid or just playing dumb on gun posts. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, man!

It's not really "stalking" to call a dumbfuck a dumbfuck. You posted a picture of a fucking cargo plane.

I love how you literally didn't read the words on the fucking plane before posting this picture and trying to make a "point".

Hey man, don't come crying to me because a "professional editor" because you're such a fucking twit that you don't know the difference between grammatical errors and well-known and basic logical fallacies. Apparently little Jeff doesn't like curse words either.

If you honestly think Green Lantern was in any way "pretty darned good", you're disqualified from talking movies online for at least 6 months.

Keep on trucking through the obvious, you incorrigible dipshit.

Let me walk you through this one, champ. "Argument from ignorance" is a logical fallacy, of the exact sort that you proposed in your initial response to my post. (Suggesting that science NEEDS to prove the absence of a mythological being) So when I said "Save your argument from ignorance nonsense.", I was referring to

Learn your logical fallacies so you don't look like a dipshit by "correcting" someone else's grammar, dipshit.

No one's angry, champ, but this is io9. Save your argument from ignorance nonsense.

Faith is not a prerequisite for friendship or charity, you'll find.

You lose whatever time, effort and worry you put into the mores and superstitions of stone age tribesmen trying to fit the square peg of their myths into the round hole of life in the 21st century. You lose the dignity of a fully examined life. You lose however long it's taken you to respond to comments online, and

Let's put it this way, buddy. If there was an omnipotent being who's so fucking petty that he creates creatures just so that he can hopefully be loved by his creations while he hides in the shadows, he's going to be super pissed if you're only believing out of playing it safe via Pascal's wager. Either go all the way

Yeah I'm definitely seeing Cap 3 opening night. Maybe Batman vs. Superman on a Sunday matinee if the RT score is above 60%.

Let's see. Without knowing what you're into, I can tell you that my favorite books right now, in order, are:

It's not "tyranny" to shut out idiots, idiot.

Let's be real. It's Marvel. They specialize in incredibly entertaining popular films that neither take too many chances or push the envelope. If you were expecting them to spend upwards of $150 million to drop "Three Days of the Condor" on us, the fault lies with you, not the film. I actually thought Redford's talents

I actually liked all of the Redford scenes - because who doesn't like Robert freaking Redford?