Crediting comm majors with creating lawyers is silly, you guys. There's an intervening law school step there. Unless you're going into IP, law schools don't give a dick what your undergrad major was as long as you had a high GPA with good LSAT scores.

There's absolutely nothing to be gained from letting prepubescent kids play tackle football. The risks far outweigh the benefits.

It depends on the school, of course, but TONS of big time athletes are communications majors anyway, which is an absolute joke of a major.

Sure, that's absolutely the case, but how many kids major in "[insert musical instrument here] performance" or dance or pottery or creative writing or any of 100 BFA programs that have even more dire and infinitely less lucrative job prospects? I'd assume that we'd still require sports majors to take the general…

LOVE Pelecanos. "Drama City" is honestly the closest thing to "The Wire" on the page that I've read.

Oh good god in heaven. Calling ME stupid doesn't make your ridiculous stance any more sensible, Mr. Ad Hominem. Glad you're schooled in the Glen Beck school of logic, though.

If "straw man" is "high falutin' debate team jargon" and not "Logic 101", then it's obvious you shouldn't be permitted to have discussions online.

We can all tell how much of a TENNIS PIMP you are, thanks to your handle, Mr. "DropShot69".

Yet another straw man. WHATEVER big programs do, that has literally NOTHING to do with whether or not this kid's record is so meaningless as to be nonsensical AND whether his coach and the school should be ashamed.

Where did I trumpet my approval for scheduling cupcakes? That's a total straw man argument. Whatever Syracuse does or doesn't do, this coach is certainly an asshole.

You didn't know that the NCAA football scoring record is when 2009 Alabama beat the intramural flag football team of the Deltas 991-0?

There's "winning the game" and then there's "intentionally singling out inferior competition to manufacture publicity stunts against". Good attempted analogies with other sports, though!

Btw, can we talk about the "revelation" that if you force your opponent into 32 Turnovers AND take 25 more shots, you'll PROBABLY win?

When we're talking about a "record breaking performance" vs. the worst team in NBA history (playing vs. NBA defense)... IT IS YOU TWIT!!

Besides, where do you get off thinking 1.125 pts/shot is good? It's not. The Charlotte Bobcats averaged 1.16 pts/shot last season. THE CHARLOTTE BOBCATS.

A player on the other team shot 34/44 = 77% = 1.6 pts per shot. Where's his national media love?

Any time your stat line includes 45 missed three pointers, you're basically an asshole middle schooler playing NBA 2k.

Hey man, you use words like "happy to be a part of history" and you ask for assholery.

He shot 27-72 from 3. If you're celebrating that, you don't like basketball enough to get an opinion.

He shot 27-72 from 3. That's offensive by any possible metric.