All these gawker media articles have the feel of PAID ENTERTAINMENT ADVERTISING rather than actual explanations or redirects. They seem to be saying, "Look at the SHINY NEW MOVIE. It's not a piece of crap. You LOVE IT."

All these gawker media articles have the feel of PAID ENTERTAINMENT ADVERTISING rather than actual explanations or redirects. They seem to be saying, "Look at the SHINY NEW MOVIE. It's not a piece of crap. You LOVE IT."

HOW COULD WE ALL HAVE BEEN SO WRONG?!

A series of big sloppy wet media b***jobs paid for by the Studio, you mean.

This movie was LOST... in Space.

No 3d modeling of the script or plot was done. Sorry.

Except that this sort of thing is Lindelof's signature brand of crap writing and plotting, and LOOKS it.

He siezed upon a bottle of Jack Daniels, emptied it, and had three car accidents.

Which will win EVERY Oscar that year, including Best Original Screenplay...

The 1% and their Congresslaves (as well as those brave few who aren't serving the Banksters) will have top tier ALWAYS.

You have something there - if pictures are taken of ANYONE ELSE who was not able to consent fully and with complete understanding of what the pictures were for, it would BE EXPLOITATION.

THANK YOU.

Somebody at Something Awful PLEASE photoshop an alien "Engineer" nailed up onto a cross... PLEASE?

You're a moron among many morons, then.

Wait for the DVD release - then you can watch it the way it was intended:

FILM as a whole is art. THIS FILM is not.

It's the only glitter that this steaming turd of a movie HAS.

This movie should have been nailed to a rock and its liver torn out by an Angry Bird.

This is an awful abortion of a film.

Gimme a break. It was a 2-hour, painfully-hard-to-watch Carnival of Dumb.