Yeah.

Always gotta ruin the party, don’t you dave?

k

Damn. That’s some snitch-ass shit! But I’m okay with it.

#4 almost made me legit cry the first time it happened.

Your Title IX analysis leaves something to be desired, and it’s the reason this scheme is destined never get off the ground.

Those working in service occupations earn an average of $28,028 annually, which is not even close to their actual take-home pay.

The fact that you think $50 is “rather cheap” demonstrates the point I’m trying to make here.

How many working class kitchens you know have a sous-vide machine? Brandy? Access to a grocery store to buy all these ingredients?

it’s pate. pate is considered a decadence.

I’m implying that the majority of wage workers don’t own a sous vide machine and a charcuterie board, nor do they have the means to access the ingredients to make your pate, despite your anecdote.

Wut

You ever read a headline that makes you realize how out-of-touch you are with the plight of the working man?

No its “hey you’re from jamaica, i’m going to make fun of you for that”

That was a bad take when Burneko made it, and it’s a bad take now.

Yeah... no.

“You guys should probably, maybe, perhaps take some responsibility in the handling and coverage of the matter,” Loesch insisted

Hi Nick!

Please, please don’t tell me that the first thing you guys asked was whether she had autism. I really don’t want to dump this blog.

Bout as serious as your bawlshit nonsense.