Absolutely possible. If you can't get drivers out, your costs of doing so is going to rise.

It's indeed precisely how it's supposed to work, and it looks like it has. Either consumers were put off by the prices and didn't use Uber (plenty of other choices in that market) and Uber won't attempt a similar hike in the future, or consumers weren't bothered enough not to use it and got what they paid for. Weird…

People have the choice to, you know, not pay the prices, even without regulation and oversight. And it sounds like they indeed have widely chosen not to. If consumers were put off and this wasn't successful, Uber won't hike their prices as much next time. If consumers weren't put off, then they're getting what they're…

That would be nice, but that's not exactly a niche that the Supra ever competed in. In 1997, the cheapest Supra you could buy (base NA) had an MSRP of $27k; that's a tick under $43k in constant 2013 dollars.

There's only one better way to get into China than with GM, and that's with VW. Not sure this does anything for Peugeot on that front, unless GM was cockblocking their entrance into the market, which I can't imagine given GM's hard-on for China.

I'm not huge on the front but, good god I'm about to say this about a Sebring, this isn't a bad looking car. It even looks like it may not drive like shit.

Not unexpectedly, yesterday's wild custom 2009 Corvette Z06 took away some praise for its audacious presentation, but it also took home an 84% Crack Pipe loss for its one hundred and fifteen thousand dollar price. I don't think - and some of the comments back this up - that the car isn't worth something in that…

What kind of accountant are you that you're making management's decisions for them?

The proletariat: misunderstanding pretty much everything about accountants and accounting since the beginning of time.

"And it's not like Vettes retain their value well anyway."

Your words, not mine.

This is even less of an argument than my non-argument.

"No one does before they're a CEO"

You seem to have missed that I'm completely unconcerned with this as it relates to her, specifically; I happen to believe that she's a great choice. But responding to asinine, poorly constructed criticisms with asinine, ambiguously constructed responses does nothing to bolster her credentials. It's cute, and not…

It's before being a CEO at GM.

You're viewing the word CEO has a universal, permanent term; once you're a CEO, you're always a CEO, treating the title much like an accreditation such as MBA, PhD, or JD. I'm just not buying that usage. It's not an accreditation, it's a title that's held with a specific job, that comes and goes with the job. You can…

It's not an adequate response to the what the question is asking.

That's not particularly relevant to the question, and it's a snarky answer to the question, which is why I pointed out the ambiguity in the response.