As in the exact same discussion that’s been popping up for years every time Woody Allen is mentioned. I kinda figured that was obvious.

Also, I kinda feel that sarcastically repeating back my own talking points isn’t really a valid argument, nor is making assumptions about my intent.

Soooo... that’s a no to having anything relevant to say? You criticize my comment as useless, but you’re not even vaguely interested in engaging in the discussion at hand?

Mhh sure, I see nothing wrong with that.

“And as opposed to your snarky comment, which fails to actually engage with a single thing I said?” I could say in response, and we could go back and forth like that infinitely, but what would be the use in that?

But yes, I do feel most of my ideas were fairly novel to the discussion and so I though why not try and…

I’ve tried my best to all my adult life. What’s your point exactly?

That’s true, and I’d say a strong point in the films favor. Usually works dealing with these topics are waaaay more judgmental of their characters.

Fuck Woody Allen for being a monstrous pedophile....

Is what I would say if i KNEW he was guilty, but I don’t.

Fuck the Farrows for slinging false accusations at an innocent man for decades...

Is what I would say if I KNEW they were lying, but I don’t.

And neither do a single one of you, so how about fuck the useless…

I dunno, I saw him as more of a counter-point to Olsen’s character. At first he comes off pretty silly and so we join the movie in poking fun at him, but once Olsen’s veneer of cool has been stripped away and we see how shallow and constructed her personality is, his obsession comes off in comparison as something very…

This all sounds like something out of a William Gibson novel.

Pfffft, I’d go even further. IGW may be flawed but it’s at least a functional movie, not just a delivery vehicle for a self-serving lead performance.

I found the movie alright, boring direction and a bit thin on ideas, but Plaza really does make it worth watching. I found lots of little details fairly potent (the hahaha/hehehe scene, like you mentioned), but by the end the movie never really reached for much substance beyond “Gee, kids these days sure are obsessed…

Yah, Antichrist is the sort of film that most peoples relationship with is lot more complicated than simply “liked it” or “didn’t like”.

Inside hardly has that film’s thematic or stylistic scope, but it’s a lot more focused, and IMO effective, as a result.

Darn, you missed out on the best one of the lot if you ask me. Though those first 3 are all pretty much the cream of the crop from that era of horror.

Truthfully I wouldn’t even know how to call myself an Uber if I wanted one, they’ve been on and off banned in my city so I’ve never used em, not even sure which side of that they’re currently on.

Yeah, that was the film that made me realize I’d watch him in just about anything.

Ahem, that’s Daveed Diggs from Clipping, thank you very much.

Whoo boy, here we go.

So many people seem to have this tendency when analyzing stories (be they films, books, whatever) of only thinking in absolutes. Just cause Sam Rockwell’s character shows that he’s not a complete monster, does that have to automatically mean the storyteller is absolving him of his flaws?…

I’d like to join in the praise for Jumanji, but I feel I might be biased...

Plus, after the movie it was so cold my car wouldn’t start and I had to leave it stranded in the parking lot and walk home, so that kills a lot of the film’s goodwill, no matter how charming I was in it.

Ooooh oooh oooh everyone, listen to this guy, he knows what he’s talking about!

Dead End is fantastic, most underappreciated horror film of the 2000s, perhaps? Either way it’s got Ray Wise, who I’d say is DEFINITELY one of the most underappraciated living actors.

If you want a better version The Belko Experiment, watch Joe Lynch’s Mayhem.

Sadly, this is not the headline involving Chris Brown and a cannon that I’ve always wished for.