Nope, you’re into philosophy now, well outside the bible. I’m speaking directly of the Covenant with Abraham. If the bible is to be believed (it isn’t) the serpent gave us free will, not god and god punished the serpent and us for it (ripped off Prometheus).

It’s entirely a lie. Concocted by the Roman’s (see their history of appropriation, the Greek Pantheon for example). They took the concept of the Hebrew Messiah (a figure of war, if King David is anything to go by) and twisted it to mean something considerably different to unite the Roman State that was fractured by…

The doubt is not probable when you consider the conduct of these people. Your assertion that their concern is in regards to secure e-mail is vastly overshadowed by their desire to attempt to hide or otherwise bury evidence (ie. delete) that speaks towards their shady conduct.

United Daesh of America.

Sure, it’s entirely possible, if you took absolutely no context in the conduct of these morons over the last year. Kushner has been “conveniently forgetful” of some incredibly serious things, connections to the Russians have been made, etc. So it’s -more- probable that they are up to some shady nonsense YET again, and…

How interesting then that you hold to such lies as “Jesus”. No different than Santa really, just another simple character (plagiarized from many others) to sell a power structure that consequently is the most damaging one in the history of humankind and continues to be such.

According to you watching the news is “research”, now this reply. Fuck you’re dense.

Jimmy Kimmel’s backdrop during his addressing of the mass killing has about 50 odd answers to that question.

I consider it the origin story would should have got.

I know, I just hate to see low-balling.

Keep Leto, ditch Ratner, make it a directorial duo, Tommy Wiseau and Uwe Boll (they both also play ALL of the bunnies), bring H.R. Giger back from the dead to do the Playboy Mansion design. Cover everything in KY Jelly. There. I would watch -that-.

Just over 100 years, actually. :P

I think Stalin would have been the most appropriate comparison here, definitely should have been mentioned.

It really is (hence my mentioning that the “laws” concerning procuring firearms are not stringent by design). It is political lip service as is, a symbolic gesture. Alarmingly it’s also the reason why gun nuts can point and say “they don’t work”.

More hyperbole, twit. More!

I pretended nothing. I literally told you that the “rules” aren’t as stringent (by design) as they should be. Precisely because that would eat into the pockets of the politicians named above.

“prolonged discussion of high waisted jeans.”

“This gunman passed every background check and purchased these guns legally.” You say it like that shit is even remotely as stringent as it should be. It is not.

Don’t talk out of your ass when due diligence has been done on the topic already and it took a matter of seconds on google to find that out.

In the case of vile misogynists, I think this thesis (sarcastic as it may have been) would stand up to practice.