Well that ain’t what you wrote. Then again, how I interpreted it ain’t exactly what you wrote either. so there’s that.

That is exactly the thing. Men have far more pressure to earn big and support everyone.

Anger is never the answer, so the hell with that. But stubborn refusal is a survival technique: “Pay for the first date no matter how much she protests”. No man has ever been criticized for paying for an entire first date, but billions of men have been lambasted for coming up with less than 100%.

OK, I’ll bite.

have you hacked my webcam?

and yet you are defending those who assaulted a man over an (alleged) racial epithet. In other words, you are defending extreme fragility.

I feel the same way - I’m a white man who was assaulted, name-called, and robbed for being white (raised in a black neighborhood, went to city schools - i don’t have regrets). I only mention this because I share his opinion, AND know that pain

It doesn’t strain credulity that a white Texan HS football referee might be racist. It is unlikely that a white texan HS football referee would audibly say the n-word while on the job as a referee during a football game. Not impossible, just seems more like a fabrication to weakly justify a pretty heinous assault.

I read the same thing, and my bullshit-o-meter started beeping like crazy.

VIDEO GAMES!!

If you’re remotely decent at the dating game, you have access to a waiting list of other partners. That one you’re with has to now practically set your soul alight within 10 days to keep you from going back to the well. It’s nuts.

How about - “I’m happy to make the cake for you, but I feel uncomfortable writing that - I’ll let you borrow my frosting writer thingy”

If you were a sign maker, should you be compelled to make a “god hates fags” sign for the WBC?

Right, let’s do nothing instead.

This should absolutely not be publicly available except for an official request made involving specific incident. For privacy of the wearers and everyone they encounter during their shift. Additionally, the material captured could aid criminals, if they started studying patrol routes and patterns. It should be plenty…

Yup - same here. My target dating demographic is 38-46. I’m drawn toward independent urban progressive women. But sometimes, OKC gets it horribly wrong. I’ll see a picture of the profile-owner in the desert, in her underwear, a viking hat, and giant boots, and I’ll be completely turned off.

The absolutely hilarious part of this is that, if she said, “You know what? Sure!” she would be up to her eyebrows in cock, while he fumbled around endlessly, eventually getting arrested for solicitation of an undercover cop on backpages.

To be fair, it played up the Argo part of it - the “truth is stranger than fiction” angle (more than a pro-US part). That was a more movie-worthy story than “Really Nice Canadians”. And if nothing else, this film did bring the actual events to light, so way more people know how it.

studies show [marriage is] a way better deal for men anyway

Fair enough - he acted out and that’s immature and crappy. You can get annoyed at the crappy behavior, but not at the fact that his feelings are hurt. That’s the biggest risk of being in casual mode, that one of your partners (or perhaps you yourself) are going to feel rejected.