Gorgeouse hunk? I kept finding myself distracted by how sickly Chalamet looked whenever you could see his bare arms. He make Davidson look healthy.

“ But, while new kids Lauren Holt, Andrew Dismukes, and Punkie Johnson all had more airtime this week than in the rest of their shows combined (don’t check the math on that), they, along with vets like Ego Nwodim, Alex Moffatt, Mikey Day, and Melissa Villaseñor, just aren’t seizing the moment. In several sketches,…

Another episode where I felt the overall quality of the sketches was pretty solid, although a couple of them suffered from not having that strong final punchline.

No. Because it was very poorly done.

The more you think about (most episodes of) Picard, the less sense it makes. If it weren’t for the lovely / fancy cinematography and sets and the nice sounding music, and to some extent the acting, it would be patently ridiculous and hardly anyone would like it.

Why would they need to attack the Federation fleet? Just shoot the planet. Do you know how big planets are and how big space is? Those Federation ships are specks. It’d be like if I tried to shoot a house and there are flies in the way.

I don’t remember every random terrible episode of TNG, but first contact had been completed with the synths, so the Prime Directive was irrelevant here.

Are you illiterate, or just choose to be ignorant? I’m not sure how to make this any easier for you to understand. This isn’t opinion. This isn’t false information. This isn’t nitpicking. The show has gratuitous plotholes. You know, when the writers are bad at their jobs, and can’t write good stories that make sense.…

You’re confusing opinion with fact. The article doesn’t just say they didn’t like the show, they list concrete and substantial issues of why it’s poorly made. That doesn’t even cover all of them, as the flaws are substantial. It is, most definitely, sloppy and pure trash, as an absolute fact.

As I said, you can choose…

You can like the show despite its flaws, but you can’t disagree with the flaws presented. They are blatant, tangible, and many. Dismissing that is outright ignorance, and accepting that is kind of baffling.  

So you’re happy that it’s full of problems, and was written like an eighth-grade fan-fiction?  I guess some people are easy to please.

The reviews haven’t been “this isn’t TNG” at all. The reviews have been, “this is shallow, cliched, poorly-written, unintelligent, mediocre Hollywood trash”, but with grades still higher than it deserves!

People can change, but that isnt what happened here. We didnt see some kind of organic progression from the person we knew in TNG to now, they simply reconned who he we understood him to be.

Do you really think people change that much from age 78-94? Nope. Not buying it. 

Thats still 2 classes. They’d throw in the Defiant and some Galaxies too.

Then you should go back and rewatch TNG the way the wife and I are. If you’re logical or objective it’s evident how wrong they got this character.

No, it was truly a let down if you’re a real Trekkie

That’s the problem. My Mom’s a psychologist. She says the one thing people never get over is the death of a child. So they effectively ruined their happy ending. I feel as so, they were douched similar to the OT three in the sequel trilogy. Ruining the happily ever after ending of beloved characters by making their…

If there’s anything this show could have done, it was give us some pretty spaceship porn. But no.

Why did they make this series?