I don’t. A child who’s done monstrous things is still a child. We consider children to be too immature to make their own decisions in other contexts, we don’t get to throw that out the window when it comes to crime.

And the cocksucker adult who didn’t lock up his damn gun.

I just stared at him for a solid minute going, “Are his eyes... migrating...?”

How is it possible that Benedict gets weirder looking every time I see him? I actually really like him and think he’s a great actor but...his face is just so freaking odd. I can’t even say “unattractive” because that’s really not it. He looks freaking alien-esque to me.

Dr. Strange is a Marvel good guy. Hiddleston is the baddie.

I don’t know, I saw a couple of people being interviewed after the debate, and they were angry and embarrassed at Trump, but still going to vote for him. They did not seem stupid, they seemed stubborn. They hated Clinton more than they were mortified by Trump.

So, the Republican party only believes a woman has ever been actually sexually harassed if it is done by a Democrat in the White House. Got it.

John McCain?! Do you not know who he is? Did you forget this coming up in 2008?

Maybe the better question is what person in Congress or Senate doesn’t think their spouse is a bitch? Only John McCain and Elizabeth Warren come to mind.

Not really. Valuing a woman by her looks is bullshit. So even if Machado was a whale she still deserves respect. And again no one including Miss Universe up there gives a flying fuck that you think she’s fuckable.

Yes because the important thing here is that you would fuck her.

Aw, I wish we lived in that world. My single health class didn’t even cover consent, and TV shows and movies get it wrong all the time. In the U.S., at least, look at the controversy over “yes means yes” and stuff like how recently marital rape laws were passed. And there are so many victims who don’t think of their…

I’m the first person to eye roll at a “trigger warning”

You’re assuming everyone knows what consent is, and that’s not true. There are people still operating under “no means no” instead of “yes means yes,” and that’s not the worst of examples.

“t doesn’t like this woman’s attempt to discuss this issue is somehow pro-rape”

Short version: it’s a methodological challenge, but somewhat doable.

You’re forgetting the other arguably more important part: it’s a video game around which large gatherings occur that has had a history of sexual assault in its community.

I don’t understand why there was such a negative reaction. Not only does it help those men educate themselves about what is consent from their perspective but also to know that men as well as women can be victims and if they are educated about consent, they can know if they are being victimized or what not to do if…

Chhetri closes the piece by justifying the relevance of “Smashers Against Sexual Assault,” arguing that “Sexual assault isn’t a women’s issue, or a gaming issue, or a men’s issue. It’s a human issue. Do your part to keep our Smash scene safe.”

It’s a videogame around which large gatherings occur, both officially and unofficially.