I agree that what she did was fucking disgusting and that she totally deserves her sentence - however, how much do you want to bet that if the genders were reversed, the sentence would be substantially shorter? Seriously, I’d put money on it.

I’d trade 25 of Texas for one NYC. At least. Frankly, we’d be far better of without Texas. Fuck you, Cruz.

Just post her photo in response to all the MRA assholes who complain that men do all the heroic and life-saving work in life. Most of those idiots would have been standing there with their thumbs in their asses. Nay, running away with their thumbs in their asses.

I’ve been married for 25 years. Some of that time has been difficult. Some people in my shoes might not have stayed. There were people who tried to tell me to go. (Not a similar situation to HRC at all). But that is the kind of decision each person can only make for themselves, and I don’t feel anyone has the right to…

Having a life estate isn’t renting. You don’t pay anything. It’s just like owning, except you can’t sell your interest or leave it to anyone in your will, it is personal to you and lasts only as long as your lifetime.

“right to work” is the biggest bullshit ever.

He has a face like a potato. I think his brain is potato-ey, to0.

Somebody almost always gets screwed in discovery disputes. Judges hate them and so they just shoot off half-assed rulings based on navel gazing. The presumption should be in favor of discovery. Discovery =/= admissibility in court. You can preserve your evidentiary objections at deposition so that if they try to use…

I must be a lousy hostess, because I’d hire a clown before I’d resort to the chair leg.

Yeah, no. #fullofshit #fuckoffalready

On the other hand, don’t you think that part of evaluating the truthfulness of a witness includes looking at their posture, their expression, their overall demeanor? I agree someone could try to make a defendant seem “crazy,” but look at cases like Jeffrey Dahmer - I have no doubt he was ACTUALLY crazy, but the jury…

I can’t even express how much I hate this scumbag.

And the years have not been kind to him.

I love how there’s a whole category for “convenience fish.”

If more dirty, criminal cops were dealt with in this way, we would not be having this crisis of mistrust in the police. The only way to deter criminal cops is to rigorously prosecute them and fire them.

Well, it’s for his protection, so he can probably waive it if he chooses.

No, it doesn’t. It really doesn’t. And if you think so, you need to go back and read your jury instructions on the subject. (Or what state are you in where that is the case? It isn’t true anywhere I know of). But in any case, one reason it is so difficult to get convictions in rape cases is because they boil down to…

They recommended 236 years in prison. Maybe they were trying to eliminate ALL doubt instead of just “reasonable doubt,” because they knew that the charges they were certain of were enough to recommend more than a lifetime in prison. That’s not how it is supposed to work, but I can imagine it happening.

I don’t know, in this case it is kind of satisfying. He caused those women such pain and suffering - he’s going to have to be segregated in prison, so it won’t be very pleasant. Nothing can undo their injury, but punishing him has to be worth something.

You’re right. Calling it “affirmative action” is a stretch. Italian-Americans were not an oppressed minority in the 1980s in America. Nice try by the author, though. Now if you want to argue that bigoted dickheads are an oppressed minority...but nah, they aren’t.