bogira--disqus
Bogira
bogira--disqus

I would like to point out that it wasn't 'forgotten' anymore than simply not discussed. Any Simpsons fan who really cared to remember can remember the house give away along with the BAJILLION other items that the Simpsons sold in the 90's. There was a time that you could actually buy just about EVERYTHING with the

Just off the top of my head the Evergreen Drive house would have to be atleast 45x30, for a nearly 2700 sq. ft. house, pretty large even for a small town and on a Nuclear Safety inspector's salary. But the garage/Dining Room exist in some warped dimension because it's clear they exist side by side and the house is

Everybody is always upgrading though, so they'll trickle in slowly but as 4k/8k projection become standards the 70mm as a stand-alone product is likely to see the end of its run. That isn't a bad thing though, it will live on as a narrow niche product for probably the rest of our lives but digital projectors will

Winn's character is making me uncomfortable because he's oscillating around two separate points. He's supposed to be the 'head' sidekick to James' 'heart' but he's also a creepy character pining for Kara. So it's hard to disassociate his deep love affair with her for his high ideals on superheroes. In so many cases

Pedantic….and again, once it enters common usage it is acceptable not necessarily 'correct' which is pretty subjective according to language.

Completely true, I enjoy film and will probably see the hateful 8 in 70mm if I can (a small indy theater plays mainstream films in 70mm locally). But it's hard to claim merit in the format that can do so much but is limited. I don't want The force awakens shot in 70mm. But I do appreciate films that can use the

Well get ready for Austin Powers 4. I think the first one was a great 'fish out of water' film of a spy from the 1960's joining the 1990's (and while it seems dated now, we're really only smart cars and internet difference). At the time, Goldeneye was only out two years so it was an interesting argument as Pierce

This goes right back to loving the static of your old Jazz albums. Children growing up today don't really see a point to film except cinephiles and even that is to some extent an element of the process itself but then it becomes an aesthetic and tied to nostalgia rather than relevance.

I like the idea and access to 70mm but lets be honest, in another few years digital projectors will simply erase any edge 70mm has (currently, IMAX is still a bit sharper than premium digital projectors including IMAX's own).

In the 1950's & 1960's the power of hairspray kind of made real hair vs. wigs a moot subject. In the 1970's wigs abounded but it's subjective into whether or not they were super bad….Really as we moved to more natural hairstyles in the 1990's the quality of wigs didn't keep up and it became more obvious. Plus, this

I was literally watching The Notorious Bettie Page last night and while Gretchen Mol does Gretchen Mol (i.e. annoying passive-aggressive with a minor stilt) they couldn't actually get her to grow her hair out for the pic or dye it raven black. So in a couple of scenes you clearly see her move her wig and it irritated

I rarely notice wigs unless they're super obvious. Most of the time I'm just never staring at their hairline and in a crime against AV nerds, I thought half the wigs look believable on this list. Berry's and Tunney's stand out as fine but subjectively unattractive.

It was a good movie for the time but it was sandwiched between the Wayne's World movies which made a huge return on the first one and covered the second's cost. He had a pretty successful stint from 1992-2008, 16 years and 8 solid out of the park hits.

It's bad, it's also something to watch with nerdy movie friends or just as a general viewing party with friends recognizing HOW bad the movie is. Otherwise don't watch it alone. It's a bad movie that makes cheap B-movies done on MST3K seem wonderful.

Both are technically acceptable, but since this is a book adaptation 'on' is the preferred.

Depends, as a historian it's harder for me to miss bits but a ton of jokes in the 70's and 80's just don't make much sense anymore. There is a reference to Gary Gilmore in an early season I had to look up. It all ages poorly but so do most topical sketch shows.

That's kind of a misnomer. Myer's own filmography supports that he's had 3 really good franchises and a bunch of clunkers. Basically if you make him play Wayne, Austin Powers, or Shrek he'll make you a mint. Besides that, it's a crap shoot. He's really only starred in 5 films outside of those franchises and only

It was a good solid episode, Gosling was game to be funny. The pervy child sketch with Bryant was weak but only because they've turned her into a creepier and creepier character with each appearance. It's funny when she's overtly sexual, it's not as much when you're pushing her other factors.

Which is perfectly fine. :) Isn't it amazing when we can have an adult conversation that doesn't devolve into hate spewing remarks?

I never go to the French Quarter, it's a tourist trap of Mecca proportions. But i'll have to try the others sometime.