Honestly, that's the core of South Park though. If they had to admit that they leaned towards the right in terms of 'law and order' they would have to admit that they support a certain level of ephemeral order over evaluating the deeper questions of why and why not. They actually do occasionally beg the question but…

Yes, because you're defending 'order' and not any sense of privilege and racial identity. Some isolated incidents aren't really about attack BLM's meaning which seems to be what you're increasingly implying.

Well don't worry, the right has basically pointed out they represent everything evil, wrong, and slothful in this country. So white-middle-class citizen, don't you worry about BLM getting too big for their britches….

Hubris is reserved for those with armies and bodyguards. It plays well sometimes in a story but this is one of those moments where supernatural or not it's just hackneyed.

I'm actually quiet satisfied with this episode. They're finding their footing without losing their way, actually tying up loose ends and not making us wait 5 episodes to see a character redressed from episode 2/3. Even the simple throwaway characters of the two Scandinavians were an interesting call back, in fact it…

That's been their argument in numerous interviews when they discuss it. I believe it was Sony or Universal who found it profitable enough to deny them renewal (or want an obnoxious sum) after they got people to watch it again.

Well you have to remember that they're basing the rights to the film as a film within your film, so it's going to be shown X amount of times on streaming services or shown on cable. It's actually surprisingly valuable given that it becomes a secondary screening method & interest is generated for the original…

You would be surprised if he wants to use films that got distributed at a decent level. Manos the Hand of Fate was super cheap but other films have been removed wholly from the library because they lost the rights. Also he has to build the sets, get a studio, hire actors for several weeks/months but the film rights…

I've watched rifftrax, that's why I'm tentative on a joel reboot since he's only extending an olive branch and not getting Mike et al signed on.

Nooooooooo! :( I've ruined another poster.

If I don't particularly care for Joel and have expressed some interest in watching it if it comes out what do you want from me? I'm not being hypocritical, I'm being honest. Is it more irritating that I'm aware of it?

3 networks, 2 hosts, 2 full sets of voice actors….Was the zeitgeist ever there? I always took it as a cult classic, it was awesome but I don't think it ever held the world captive.

I'm excited but tentatively. Joel was a weak sister next to Mike and while I'm glad to see the show rise from the ashes like a poorly quoted reference to a 1980's movie phoenix, I just want to see more Mike episodes.

He needs to secure rights to movies which I suspect is a big part of the budget since they have to be bought indefinitely.

That was my underlying issue with the SPECIAL system, I tended to favor Luck in my early playthroughs and then went towards Intelligence. I'll be honest, there is a noticeable difference without a higher luck element and it wasn't detrimental to the game but it made the experience different but not in a pleasant way,…

That's actually fairly easy, all those choices have measured save values, the problem is it would only work for PC since FO3/NV aren't available on next-gen consoles.

I feel you, in a sad way I tend to do that in GTA V, where I basically stare down the minimap while looking at the actual world only in a vague way. It's kind of why i wish games would do better GPS (even if it meant a very visible click-line that radar-popped) because it can ruin a great game.

In many respects most people still want to have children and see their progeny as an example of both innocence and lineage. If this is the post-apocalyptic waste land, you definitely want your children to survive and go on….

There is some debate it's C, but it's intentionally kept dark and awkward and it doesn't make sense otherwise for him to have info on her just for listening in (and her insisting on not naming him). I think it was meant to be C then AVRed to cover that story change.

It felt like she was playing somebody far younger than she was but she was fine by any stretch of the imagination. Monica Belucci was quietly strong though…for only being on screen for a few minutes she was powerful.