...And?

Hey everybody, it's THAT guy! 

Lussier gave a negative review to a franchise film??? I would have thought that physically impossible. 

Yeah, no one ever accused “The Sandman” of having any substance.

When the comics were new, fan art and frequent guest artist pinups/galleries always skewed toward making Morpheus look like whoever was “dark and edgy” at the time. Until around ‘93 or so, that meant he often looked like Robert Smith, with frizzy hair, slightly softer features, and occasionally frumpyish clothing.…

He's done nothing to indicate that his attitude, views, or behavior have changed. An apology without genuine repentance isn't worth the paper it's printed on. 

I fully support this change, but please god let them keep using animatronics in the ride (either new or re-vamped.) I'm suck of going on rides that are basically just hallways lined with oversized TV screens. 

I'd argue that Baby Yoda has tons of personality (they actually made him kind of a jagoff at first,) but yeah, this dipshit from Rise of Skywalker almost doesn't even exsit. 

You mean the puppet who clearly only existed as a response to the public’s affection for Baby Yoda? “People are going nuts for this cute puppet! Put him in the next movie!”

It's a fair point, but quality has nothing to do with this conversation. 

Did you saw "ex" leper? 

My favorite kinky Loki story is when Skadi’s fsther was killed and she demanded (among other things) a “bellyfull of laughter.” Loki provided this by tying his testicles to a goat.

“ she was participating in abuse”

Like those slutty women who participate in their rapes, right?

Is she paying Medium for all the articles linked in that blog? Did she pay the British government to see Depp for what he is? Did she pay Depp’s assistant to text her messages over a months-long timeline detailing his abuse towards her?

Amber Heard is an actor, not Professor Moriarty.

Not ALL Boomers, huh? 

“G/O Media: who needs editors when you’ve got SpellCheck?”

It’s a generally well-made movie in most aspects (writing, acting, direction, all the technical stuff, etc) that is absolutely unnecessary because it does almost nothing different than the Nolan films. Not that Nolan’s films were perfect, but this new flick is so similar in style, themes, plot, and characterization…

Good.

Apropos of nothing: if you haven’t already, I highly recommend watching “Succession.”

Brent Simon had a job to do, and that’s to review this movie on its own terms. In that respect, he’s done his job well enough. But beyond that, there’s also a responsibility to address a film outside the vacuum of its opening and closing credits. Who made it? What kind of people were in front of and behind the camera?…