I'm just messing around. Calm down man. This game looks fantastic.

Look at those low res console textures!

apparently it's *fuckassery*

EVERYTHING I just mentioned is in Crysis 2. You're eating the game for breakfast because you have a video card that was $700 last year. There's something called accessibility bro. I don't think the objective was to bring down the top end graphics cards...rather to simply provide a better implementation or DX11 than in…

Err iPad 2? The A5 is more powerful than any current Android SoC. Runs multiple circles around the Tegra 2, bets the Qualcomm S3, and the Exynos is unoptimized junk right now so it can't compete.

Come back when CryEngine 2 features SSDO, global illumination, deferred rendering (add even 3 lights in Crysis and watch your frame rate tank...in CryEngine 3 you can add 40+ lights and lose no performance), particle based volumetric lighting, contact shading, full water physics w./ splash and ripple effects, DX11…

CryEngine 2 is better than 3? If you're going to directly compare Crysis 2 and Crysis as what can be doen with each engine...you're comparing wrong. CryEngine 3 can do everything 2 can do...and more.

Crysis 2 is far more hardware intensive after the high res texture pack and the DX11 upgrade. Blows Crysis right out of this universe.

No I really liked Warhead. It was fast paced and intense...just really short. I just hate Crysis. Also...just one thing. You know you don't have to use tactical options right? You can look for all fo the things I pointed out yourself if you ignored it.

Crysis had amazing AI? Last time I checked when two Koreans walked into eachother they died. Crysis had terrible AI. They freaking walked in straight lines towards you.

Why did it suck? I think it was a lot better than Crysis. Crysis was just a benchmark tool. The gameplay was boring. Crysis Warhead was very fun, but short as hell. Crysis 2 actually had a focused and coherent storyline (not some screwed up way of saying: Ok you're on an island...go help those people...oh noes!!…

Crysis 2 was a major let down? Excuse me? There's a good reason why with DX11 and high res texture and Patch 1.9, a GTX 480 could only max it out at 1920x1080 with an average of 35 FPS.

Either way...I'm not even sure VGChartz is accurate. A few months ago EA announced that Crysis 2 had reached 2 million sales. Even weeks after that, VGChartz was showing sales reaching 1.4 million. Made no sense to me, unless a ton of people randomly decided to buy the Steam version. (Which I doubt...the peak Steam…

Oh I've been busy playing Crysis 2 in DX11 with Sandbox maps, maps ported from Crysis Wars, drivable civilian vehicles, and cmapaign co-op. It's pretty awesome what mods can do. You can drive around the CELL helicopters and stuff.

Shut the fuck up people. You killed Crysis 2 for PC in the same exact way. Just BITCH, BITCH, and BITCH! You gave it 2 star reviews everywhere and no one bothered to buy it. Now the 900 remaining people on the servers gave their positive feedback...but does it matter? A game that's already been killed by morons…

VGChartz doesn't include digital download sales. Just saying. I recall DICE saying they made more money off BC2 PC than either console version.

Here [www.crydev.net] Happy? Island in CryEngine 3?

I still can't find it....any hints?

I disagree. Crysis 2 in its full glory has a lot more going on for it than a bunch or randomly placed trees with sunshafts coming through. Then add the BlackFire 2 mod and you'll be shitting your pants.

Crysis 2 was designed with consoles in mind and after the DX11 updates and stuff, it blows every other game right out of the water.