I never said PC Gaming was dying. Just explaining the basis behind that statement. Most gamers don't give a shit about what happens on PC anymore.

Crysis 2 in DX11 looks better than Crysis 1...just saying. I think the whole Crysis is better deal is because an island naturally looks better than a city. But if you want to get in to the details, Crysis 2 has a lot more going on for it than just a bunch of randomly placed trees with sunshafts coming through.

Yes they can? Linux? The Linux kernel based off UNIX.

PC Games don't look that much better because of DirectX. DirectX is good in the sense that it allows you to use the same game code from everything ranging from G80 to R770 to GF119 However, in order to preserve this universal compatibility, it destroys your potential performance, since it limits you to its APIs rather…

No...the term "console port" is just a general way of saying the game has no benefits on PC. The game is still made on a PC and ported to the 360, except designed with 360 limitations in mind.

Most gamers play on 360 and PS3. And honestly I'm not going to count all of those people with 2004 laptops that play Counter Strike and WoW all day as PC Gamers. PC gaming is rather weak right now. Sales for individual games are small on PC compared to consoles. There are easily 5 million people that play on their…

Subpar hardware? Lol you're simply delusional. Are you living in 2004 when that was true? Or do you like telling yourself that your $400 Dell has even near the build quality of a MacBook Pro. Or you're in denial about the fact that any UNIX based OS will tear Windows to shreds in terms of sheer performance on the same…

Well she knows how to move dat ass.

I wonder if MW3's engine will be able to compete with this. Beats Blops for sure.

Wait PC Gamers go to Gamestop? I thought 70% of PC sales were through digital sources.

More Elena Seigman?

The Ceph are coming!

Because it won't..? Unreal requires more RAM than 64MB. And a better CPU than a 266 MHz ARM 11 core that was introduced in 2003. (It's not even a Cortex-A8 damn it...and that's already 2008...this year we have the quad core 2.5 GHz A15 coming out...wtf Nintendo??)

And also uses less than one watt and you can carry it places for 10 hours and it weights much less than 6 year old technology. :O the magic!

This with no 32GB iPhone 4 and the 32GB iPhone 5 @ $199.

I can see a $199 32GB iPhone 5 with a 64 @ $299, and then the iPod touch having the $229 @ 16 GB. $299 is 64GB. And $399 is 128GB.

No. Flash memory is very cheap. The manufacturing costs between 16GB and 32GB NAND are almost the same. (The only real difference comes from R&D costs). It's just that for years customers have become accustomed to paying a lot more for more space...Apple could provide a 64GB base model and a 128 as a secondary, and…

Amazon or Yahoo!. Anything but Google.

So Crysis 3 is coming out on October 25? With lower system requirements than Crysis 2..again?

But iOS does not swap to storage. Using a swap file with NAND memory is practically suicide for your device.