bmcgreevy
BmacIL
bmcgreevy

I hope they all get it and get significantly ill or worse. These people are scum. 

The Continental never sold well because it NEVER looked as expensive or nice as it was (for the most part). Bland, and too understated in a car world of over-styled excess. It would have looked great ~10 years ago. 

It’s a...busy design.

Because it is terrible

In the age of rampant overstyling and questionable styling themes (cough Silverado yak yak cough cough), I’ll take a little bland and understated that also looks quite good.

Yes same platform. 

Conservation of momentum.

See Ranger for an idea of how it’ll do.

Least surprising headline I’ve read in a while.

Instinct should be: “I see reverse lamps on, I should stop or slow significantly to avoid a potential collision.

It’s such a big deal that NO OTHER CARMAKER does it.

This is outweighed by others’ utter frustration and rage that they think a GM vehicle is about to back up in a parking lot. No, they need to go. Put a puddle lamp in the bumper if you need that function.

I hate that about all GM cars. They need to stop it. 

As an engineer, I <3 that the designs from that era were often so robust, that they will continue on like this. 50's-60's NASA and other aerospace engineers were incredible. 

Electric crossover will be fast follower on technology. Next!

It is when the competitors are dynamically very good.

GM’s decision to retain the bunker feeling for outward visibility and make the interior ergonomically weird, and overall less usable than its competitors is a a shame. The Alpha chassis is that good, but on top of it sits a stupidly-styled body.

Crack pipe

Much, much better.