You need some eyeglasses. They have nearly unanimously praised looks across the entire lineup. You’re actually the first person I’ve heard/seen call them ugly. I don’t own one but love what they’ve been up to.
You need some eyeglasses. They have nearly unanimously praised looks across the entire lineup. You’re actually the first person I’ve heard/seen call them ugly. I don’t own one but love what they’ve been up to.
Sounds pretty familiar (I have a 15 Coyote). Pair with a Corsa exhaust and it’s pure sonorous music.
The peak gains are usually not the big improvements. The midrange is where it shows most. There is a decent difference in midrange torque on the Mustang, for instance:
Growth will be stagnant without increasing demand. Demand does not go up without increases in disposable income. Disposable income does not increase by giving companies tax breaks. I’m sorry, it’s proven that it does not. They had a forum of 50 Fortune 500 CEOs and nearly every one said that they wouldn’t change wages…
Republicans have an atrocious record on jobs/economy, and their tax bill is more proof of that (not saying Dems are wonderful...plenty of evidence to the contrary, but in general better for the majority of americans). It’s pretty easy to defeat that argument if you get to have a discussion with someone that’s…
Not if you’re in Alabama, apparently. Too soon?
Bye, Felicia Florida.
“I just don’t see any more potential out of the Mustang chassis without a complete redesign at this point. The 350R to me pretty much seems like the limit.”
Not sure anyone is drag racing right out of their driveway either. It still is limited. Of course, I don’t romp on my V8 till the oil is up to temp either.
Oh you nailed it. Spot on.
I agree but with one fairly significant caveat/exception: braking and cornering in an F1 car does require pretty significant strength AND endurance. Women would have to build up more leg strength to be on the same level here, as well as neck strength. It IS completely achievable, though. Money is the biggest hurdle.
By asking that question you’ve revealed you either have zero clue how things like three way catalysts in gas cars or SCR in disels work...or you’re a massive troll.
Head of the DOT is appointed by and works for the president. You’re either suffering from cognitive dissonance or are ignorant.
She works for him. You really believe he had no knowledge?
This.
“How to be a spiteful, paranoid child”
You know exactly why. It’s because he is dead set on reversing anything and everything that Obama did, regardless of whether it was good or not. Fucking spiteful child. I hope the slurred speech the other day is a sign of a stroke to come, but it was probably was just his dentures coming out.
$150k is also for a sleeper. Tesla isn’t offering a sleeper because the range their trucks are touting makes no sense to have one with. A regular cab is typically $90-120k depending on the buying power of the fleet and the options chosen.
Which emissions? CO2? Vehicle B produces less. NOx (the primary cause of smog)? Vehicle B produces far more. Out the tailpipe of cars are: N2, NOx, O2, H2O, CO, CO2, SOx, unburnt HCs and other particulates (soot), among other things. Which ones are you talking about?
Of course they’re in conflict with each other, just as they are with a gas car or diesel truck. If you accelerate quickly often, you’ll drain your finite energy in your pack/fuel tank. The difference is you can fill those diesel trucks up pretty quickly if you need to while in transit. It’s unlikely that anytime soon,…