Yeah but why 315 fronts for drag?
BmacIL
bmcgreevy
Yeah, that’d be the only reason. An AWD system that can handle this much power would make the car ~5000 lbs, so I don’t think it’ll be AWD.
Why would you want 315 width fronts for drag racing?
Thank you...finally someone gets it lol
Why would you put 315 wide fronts on a drag car?
I think it’s sweet that they’re doing a drag-focused car, but why would you put 315 fronts on a drag car? That would imply canyon carver, but the tire selection says drag.
315 width fronts would imply canyon carver, yet the tire selection is for drag (and they are NOT a good street tire). Why so wide in front? I get why you would put 315s out back...even the Hellcat needs that.
This lol.
And this is why faith in humanity is pretty much in the shitter.
I’ve worked on the design and development of emissions systems for commercial diesel trucks and can tell you that you have been fed a lot of nonsense.
While that is true, you’re also preventing refugees and good people from those countries to come here, and there are a shit ton more of them. This also furthers the ISIS/radical agenda to hate America by saying that we hate Muslims (which would be easy to assume and correct regarding our government officials if this…
Yes for everything else but this car. If you read and analyze the WEC rules you’ll see that they will favor smaller turbo engines over larger NA engines.
V6 because they wanted to win Le Mans. That’s the whole reason they built the car.
False. The bulk engine does fit, for the most part, but the oil cooler crashes with the power steering in the Mustang.
So? AWD vs RWD. 3800+ lbs vs. ~3000 lbs. The GT will stomp it around a racetrack.
The road car won’t have the prodigious anti-lag system that causes that sound.
The road car won’t have the prodigious anti-lag system that causes that sound.
Boring and purposely-artificial (the caution timer yellows for the truck series was the last straw for it being a real racing series) racing series makes changes to make racing far more complicated and artificial. Got it.
Ok wow, you don’t deserve any more responses because 1) you don’t read/understand, and 2) you attacked me and not the argument. You/your source are cherry-picking a data set and incorrectly drawing conclusions about a causal relationship. That the data and Obama being president are correlated is not under dispute,…