C’mon, how do you not see that?

Those are very fair points. I still believe that he would be more than capable, having known/worked for (indirectly) him.

Agreed. I’ve always kinda wanted one and always spend too much time looking when I see them in traffic.

Things like gaskets start to deteriorate, particularly with old fluid just sitting there. It might be fine, but I would certainly have it in the budget to replace a lot of things like that.

Do not want, as much as I like the S2000. A car sitting that long is terrible for so many things...

I think that’d mostly be covered under the quick lane change testing, which is essentially an offset-gate slalom that has to be done above a certain speed and hitting no cones.

You! You get more stars! I would also add that we should require emergency handling assessments prior to handing out a license, e.g. panic stop, quick lane change, low mu cornering and braking at a minimum. I’m a big fan of the SCCA’s Street Survival program for teens that does all this, as well as showing them how…

Neutral:

Of course it’s not, but you missed the point. Great leaders do not need to be experts in the intricate details of how every part of the operation runs, and generally shouldn’t be, either. They need to surround themselves with people who are, and who will speak up. The great leaders create an environment where it’s…

Do you know how much politics and diplomacy it takes to ascend to the top levels of a large company like Boeing or Ford? A lot. This man is a ridiculously gifted natural leader and an engineer. Unlike Trump, Mulally would find the absolute best and most knowledgeable people in all the aspects of the job, and lead with…

Really liked it till it was confirmed to have no manual option. Very, very poor oversight by FCA. It’s officially off the ‘I-want-it-when-I’m-a-little-older-but-still-want-fun’ car list. Shame really, as it looks great and would be a hoot with that TT V6.

Yeah, I mean those are specifics. The biggest part is that he showed people how. It doesn’t matter the problem, he’d figure out how to get the best people on it, and ask those people the right questions to get the solutions. It would work just as well in the social sector/government as it did at Boeing and Ford.

I am proud to say I worked for him (a few layers down, but still) and also experienced how remarkably down-to-earth and honestly caring he was about his employees. He treated me and others just like regular folks having a conversation. He got people to be honest and committed to purposes greater than themselves. Total…

The guy is an amazing leader. It’s got nothing to do with business. He could lead anything...corporate/social/government, you name it.

You don’t understand, this guy is the definition of humble and empowering leadership, all while being charismatic and fun. He could lead anything (not hyperbole).

Having known/talked with and worked for (indirectly, a few levels down) this man, I would’ve quit my job and campaigned for him had he run for President. SoS is great, but not where we need him.

TROLL SIGHTING!!! WOO

What you’re talking about there is communism. Socialism, to many extents is alive and well here in the US (Social security, welfare, Medicare/Medicaid, etc.), it’s just cherry picked and really shitty in some areas. We’d be a lot better off as an entire society with some of the policies that our european friends have…

Well, I guess in essence I did mean the computer. Robotics/automation is just an application of the computer.

Unlike social welfare, this would just be a tax break, not a handout. If it were me I would make it based on consumption and provide enough of a deduction to make fuel costs the same percentage of income as the average American, and that’s it.