I starred this so hard.

“It’s not the federal government’s job to make sure people have health insurance.”

My name is John Rocker and I approve this message.

Millimeters is still offsides.

The NFL has to invent rules to give one side an advantage?

The seats were different on a diesel?

2010 Mustang the filler is on the left. So even the same model switches from one generation to the next

I’m going to politely disagree on this one. Anybody with large hands will tell you exactly how crappy trying to hit a soft key really is. Swiping with calloused fingers? Seriously, fuck that nonsense.

Even better... I logged into the website to change my password, but the app still works without me changing anything.

To be fair, UNC-Charlotte is the appropriate nomenclature, regardless of however popular it may or may not be.

Everything about that video was TERRIBLE.

100% of people who drink non-flouridated water will die.

Most DNA is gathered without a warrant, from crime scenes. It’s relatively easy to gather from clothes, dishes, utensils, whatever. Then you tie that evidence to a person... All without a warrant. Then you take that evidence to a judge to get a warrant, to gather DNA straight from the source.

And that’s exactly where your argument falls apart. They must get a warrant to get a sample directly from your body, or they must follow the chain of evidence and witness you leave it somewhere that they can then test for it.

It’s not though. Not even remotely close to being the same. DNA evidence is typically left at a crime scene. It’s outside of your body. Data from an implantable device is still inside your body. Your body must be manipulated in a way to gather that evidence.

Device data that contains PHI would thus be covered under HIPAA. At no point in time is identifiable patient data owned by the manufacturer or the vendor.

Most victims of abuse go on to become abusers. There’s a pretty strong cause and effect linkage there.

Only when certain people want it to be.

But don’t start insulting me

Despite the asinine responses, you’re absolutely correct as to the “why” question. As the proud owner of a 30 year old K5 Blazer, I have no idea why it’s taxed at a lower rate than modern cars.