That’s a very good question, because that question unanswered leads to things like...

Didn’t read. Not interested.

Didn’t read this one at all. Not interested in talking to people who hurl insults. Goodbye.

I stopped reading at ‘jackass.’ Goodbye.

That doesn’t make sense to me... Why would divorcing someone you have been in a relationship with for years because they won’t have sex with you any better than cheating on them because they won’t have sex with you? At least the cheating wouldn’t be forever.

Sure, as long as you ignore all subsequent comments. Which you did.

...says the person who decided to tell lies about me for no apparent reason.

Sure it was. It you totally weren’t accusing me of being an MRA nutjob. Totally.

It’s adorable how you are implying that I said sexual appetites need to be satisfied 100% of the time when I’m talking about a couple where one is celibate.

Sure, if you ignore the actual scenario I came up with and substitute it for the one you apparently wanted me to come up with instead, that’s true.

...therefore he was targeting Christians and it isn’t a rumor? Because I’m not sure what your point is otherwise.

Still not interested in what you have to say, still didn’t read.

Okay, but if both parties don’t consent? Why is cheating worse than ending a years-long marriage in that scenario? That’s the part I’m having trouble with.

What if you’re reading a book on your phone?

Thank you.

You sooooo don’t have a 5-year-old.

Not unless my birth certificate was falsified.

I love my daughter to bits, but five-year-olds can be incredibly boring. There’s only so many times in a row I can take listening to her sing the same verse of a song she only knows those words to and not very accurately before I need something else to pay attention to or I’d fall asleep.

I see, you are going to claim that your “Everyone knows that all you meant was #NotAllMen” lie is a joke now. How precious.

And what would that solution be?