bloknayrb
bloknayrb
bloknayrb

I have trouble seeing "an American ex-president" sue an author/publisher claiming that a depiction of him as an embodiment of the big brother state is realistic and non-transformative.

Oh well :P

Assuming that was a serious question, it is a show that you should watch. Short but great, Firefly is as close to perfect a show as I've ever seen (admittedly, the fact that it only had one short season is probably a big factor in this, since the writers never had a chance to screw it up). Basically, space cowboys.

Alas, I couldn't appreciate this video because my ancient work computer couldn't quite handle it and it was choppy.

No love for Firefly?

I'm not saying that all mobile apps and updates should cost money. I'm just saying that if a developer chooses to charge for a complete overhaul of an app, that's fair.

I still find it weird that mobile apps are thought of so differently from desktop-environment apps. No one expects free updates in perpetuity for Photoshop or Microsoft Office. I think it would be fair for developers to charge for an update so comprehensive that it is, essentially, a new product.

But can I run off of the map, end up waist deep in cement, fall down when shot by a robot, and be unable to get back up again in this new game? Because that was where I quit in Superman 64.

The 7 minute claim is from the NY Times post that they link to at the bottom. The actual journal article recommends 20 minutes of total exercise time, but doesn't say that less time is completely ineffective.

Upon which studies do you base your opposition to their conclusions?

Of course not, but all Gizmodo contributors are posting under a unified banner. Even if they have different opinions (and, obviously, everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion), it still looks odd when they rave about a product's design and then bash it a few years later.

This is like a creepier, more desperate version of a similar idea I had. I wanted to make shirts that advertised the approachability of the wearer (but not for dating purposes) because of the weirdness that is a subway commute.

I still don't understand why they took what probably ranks among the most intellectual book of the series and dumbed it down so much. The books aren't exactly rocket science; who thought this was necessary?

Not if they just sit you in front of the computer and have you input the key.

Under current 5th amendment jurisprudence, I'm not sure this decision was correct. The 5th amendment usually protects against testimonial evidence, which doesn't include forcing a blood test, a DNA swab, or appearance in a lineup. You'd still need a court order to make someone do any of these if they were to refuse,

Constricting? I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that they found LEGO to be too constricting. What were you trying to build with them?

Funny, you guys liked the OG Droid's design when it came out: http://gizmodo.com/5391825/motorola-droid-first-hands-on-its-a-terminator

I think part of the problem with bluetooth earpieces is that they are only useful for phone calls, and to wear one when you aren't on the phone makes it look like you're trying to look busier than you are (weird sentence but I think it was understandable). Another problem with the earpieces is that people look crazy