@mike_311: $10K? Sweet. I'm hoping for a bit as well since I make a crappy single income and am married :P

@Wish my Sonata ran on veggies: It wouldn't be if you gained 1700lbs.

@LodiGino: Not a piece of crap, but it certainly isn't OneNote!

Oh my.

@jalb: I see your point but all this really does is make it easier to find someone willing to lend a book to you if you don't have a friend who owns it. If this didn't exist then even if the publishers had no problem with lending e-books you might not benefit from it.

@jalb: They definitely aren't exactly the same, but the basic principle is. Anyone can get their hands on almost any book through their library free of charge and it is completely legal. To be honest, books that I've read from the library that I really loved I either have ended up buying or plan on buying them in the…

@jalb: They aren't in the business to provide the backbone for physical libraries either, but it seems to work out alright for them. I think the idea of lending in the first place will still work the way they want it to, namely that in the end a person will buy the book they either read and loved or didn't finish…

@garrettloughran: No, I'm Stomach Stretches. Nice to meet you though.

@Zombie Peach: Apparently, yes.

@Caturday Yet?: I believe this one goes to Star Trek though ;)

@Dusty Duster: A what search?

@earle117: No problem, glad you enjoy!

I flew last week and got through security and was at my gate in twenty minutes, yay Newark!

@give_a_man_a_match: Hm, I guess it would've been better without the link, but my intent was really just to show what I generally use as wallpaper since I don't actually have any way of benefiting from someone clicking the link.

I know this looks like self promotion but I usually use my own self-made wallpapers: [bloknayrb.deviantart.com]

For personal emails I always end with either

@elevenfive: I believe that that allows the lens to focus on anything past a certain distance, but doesn't focus on anything closer.

@ivan256: Hm, interesting... Thanks.

@Vidikron: Hm. Hasn't Pepsi reformulated more than once since then?

@Organized Chaos: Wow seriously? I guess that's no more ridiculous than the original explanation but wow.