Maybe I'm being unnecessarily harsh and bitter, but if it had been here in the US, I could imagine a pushy salesman trying to convince her that she needed to trade in her car for a new Civic for only $350 a month with a 'competitive' trade-in of $500.

My opinion is that it was quite clever of them to be able to translate a fairly aggressive design language successfully across their platform lineup. While they may all favor each other, they all favor each other quite well. Every product they have, save for the CX-9, is attractive. We know that the CX-9 is one of…

The 6, after being all new in '14, has a new grille, headlights, and more importantly an all new interior coming for 2016.

Are you kidding? Nearly every manufacturer uses a corporate grill these days (see, e.g., http://dougdemuro.kinja.com/audis-boring-s…). Plus, it is nearly universally agreed that the new Mazda corporate face is very attractive, especially compared to its Japanese rivals!

Mazda is planning short life cycles for their designs. Two years for a re-fresh, 4 for a complete redesign.

Not coincidentally, each is the best-looking vehicle in its class.

Kind of a challenging thing to do actually. Making a subcompact sedan look like an attractive mid-sizer. Just ask Nissan...OOF!

Not that this is necessarily a bad thing....

Emissions related failures are the silliest most pointless failures.

The concept that an individual could be held criminally liable for driving a car, that was made defective by a manufacturer and could not be registered because parts weren't available and had to go to work to pay the rent, to put food in the mouths of their children is abhorrent and wrong.

"if they don't know the basics of the subject, they can't make decisions for us about it," no one in government would be allowed to make a decision. Seriously.

Neutral.

That sentence about a "30 caliber magazine" hurt my brain

Oh boy. If we followed the practice of "if they don't know the basics of the subject, they can't make decisions for us about it," no one in government would be allowed to make a decision. Seriously. We have federal representatives claiming "this is a ghost gun.... it has a 30 caliber magazine that it can empty in…

Well they're police officers so they're actually more akin to the SS/Gestapo. They prey on their fellow man and frequently harass, belittle, maim, and murder innocent people. They wonder why people don't trust them and refuse to cooperate when they have a chance........this BS right here is why.

And cops wonder why people want to run away from them or have no respect for them anymore. Probably because John Q. Public now knows that chances are high that they're going to be (at the very least) jacked around by the police, or have their property stolen under false pretenses & accusation.

Nothing will happen to…

It was rhetoric that got these idiotic laws in place, so some rhetoric will be needed to reform or get rid of them.

Pretty ugly stuff. Due process is expected, and is not a privilege.

As if people didnt have enough reason to dislike cops already.

fuck these pigs