blindsquirrellfindsnutonceacentury
blindsquirrellfindsnutonceacentury
blindsquirrellfindsnutonceacentury

I think that makes you an optimist. Which is better than cynicism, so I’ll go with your take. 

Logic, without facts. Let’s continue speculating, since that’s all you’re really doing.

“you can say with absolute certainty,”

So you’re saying you know what the other plane’s emergency was? Or when they called ATC? Or what point in their landing approach they were when the other emergency was called in? Those are all part of triage too.

When 70+ lives are tragically lost, but that precious little kinja star is worth more to your cold black heart.

Apparently the other plane had also requested landing priority due to an emergency. Maybe temper that anger until some more facts are present.

Obligatory:

“SPEAK FUCKING ENGLISH!” - Geno

Oh, like someone leading a years-long campaign falsely claiming that Barack Obama was not a US (born) Citizen? Ok.

“Twenty-five years ago, 35 years ago, you look at the statistics, not even close. It has gotten totally out of control. I am totally in favor of vaccines, but I want smaller doses over a longer period of time.” - Donald Trump

“Obama is a African-born Muslim! PROVE HE’S NOT!” - Donald Jackass Trump

And the police UNION will gladly enforce it for him. #solidarity

Word. So what’s youre overall take on this device then, compared to a traditional boot with keypad?

“Removing a boot” is an option for the general public? How does that even work? Honestly asking.

That’s the one. Yelp comments include:

And herein lies the problem with most/all drug-testing. While truly terrible drugs like opiates, cocaine, alcohol pass through your system in days/hours, weed can hang around for weeks and weeks.

Was that evidenced in a link I missed? I agree that on-the-spot enforcement would be problematic, but I didn’t read that it was being used for that anywhere. I’ll go ahead an quote juansmith’s comment here since he put it so succinctly:

 

I agree with your points. Was mostly just refuting the idea that the violator has no responsibility to return the device.