Yes, especially when it’s optional. I would pay $100 a year to play games that I know I won’t finish because of various reasons vs. paying $60 for each game.
Yes, especially when it’s optional. I would pay $100 a year to play games that I know I won’t finish because of various reasons vs. paying $60 for each game.
Anyone else find it weird that people like Grimace is a Butt Plugg are still so upset over what’s essentially a rental model like Netflix? Especially when it comes to games that I only intend to play for a week or maybe just a weekend, services like this are ideal,and it seems like some other people agreed before…
As long as you have a subscription, you can play the full-games.
This is the first Switch game that is a direct sequel to a Wii U game. Not a port. So it’s the first true comparison that can be made on the Switch’s improvements over the Wii U. So it’s a legit article with a legit point.
Article: Nintendo Switch game has better graphics than Wii U game
Overwatch players? Salty?
“I play for the exploration, the feeling that I’m slowly pouring the black goop of my mind into an ant farm of level design.”
That’s that game that’s in the newspaper with the grid and all the numbers, right? :)
what’s a suikoden
Sure will!
I really enjoyed this list, Kirk. But allow me to add this to the Recommended Stories tab:
To be blunt: That concept art is really selling me. Non-sexualized female armor is my kind of jam and then it’s just a great design.
Time to pick up something like a GTX1060 or 1050.