blasds78
blasds78
blasds78

I’m sure it’s in that junkyard because of that trouble-prone V6 and even more trouble-prone transmission. We had a Spirit ES (essentially the same powertrain), and we were on a first-name basis with the dealership’s Service Manager. We liked the vehicle, but not enough to tolerate being towed so often.

Unrelated... Happy to see a read-worthy article again. 

The Traverse deserves them. It’s more minivan than sport utility. Arguably, most of the 3-row soft-roaders deserve them, but as much as the Traverse.

You can go on pretending you know anything about me or what I care about. 

I’d be offended if you mattered to me.

I didn’t claim anything to be an election-related conspiracy, neither did I say I’m ignoring anything. I’m taking this seriously, as mentioned when I said “prudent”. It’s not clear how you read any of that into my comment.

I’ll keep living life with the usual, prudent, effective flu-abating measures. Sadly, it’ll be without any of the fun places to go since all this perpetuated panic (like this article) keeps leading to shutdowns.

I’d look for something to cover that steering wheel. Otherwise, it looks good for its price. That mileage is low for a 23-year-old car, and it looks like it was fairly well maintained over the years. Nice price.

I can tell I’m dealing with a mature, rational person because you still use “retarded” in 2020.

The same is true for a GT500, anything with a Hellcat motor, a Camaro SS, a WRX, BMW Ms, AMG anything.... Hell, even a 200hp Toyota 86. All unnecessary. All dangerous to others.

This pickup isn’t taking 3 spots, either. It’s not a crew-cab dually with an 8' bed.

That 1% is roughly equal to the vehicles that regularly use all 4-5 seatbelts or sports coupes that find themselves on the track. We should all ONLY buy what we’ll fully use, right? Sell the furniture you rarely use. How many dishes do you have that rarely leave the cabinet? Wasteful excess. Do you use more than a

Sick burn. Got 'em!

I don’t like the goofy kink on the window sill, the front fascia is overwrought, and (most of all) I think the proportions are off. I’d rather see a shorter distance from the base of the windshield to the leading edge of the hood. The door could be shorter, and the rear window longer. In other words, move the cab

I’m outnumbered here. If that’s close to the final design, it’s fugly. No doubt, it’s great Ford is making it. But...it’s fugly.

Looks like AdamG8GXP didn't read the article and shared an uninformed opinion.

You like his nuts?

That roll-down rear window is also on the Sequoia and Tundra, though the Tundra is obviously not a wagon.

I feel like I remember VW doing the hang-on-the-door in its national ads starting with the Mk4 Jetta/Golf. Couldn't find it on YouTube to confirm. 

Same here. I was....a wreck.