blasds78
blasds78
blasds78

BMW repair costs are more than the 4th owners could pay, so the cars are likely in scrap yards.

At least your screen name acknowledges you’re superdumb.

Oh, look everybody! Another poignant thinker here! So “edgy” and original. Rawr! The anger!  

That's not 3D.

You seem cool...probably a good conversationalist.” - nobody

Dating back to 1940, the normal retirement age (according to the SSA) has been considered to be 65, and they’ve been debating raising that age for ~40 years. Nobody mentioned anything about it being the American Dream, and you’re making it seem like someone only does this in dire straits. In this Rorschach test,

Unnecessary use of a big word when the more common “proactively” would’ve sufficed.

I know a 72-year-old who says he’s gotta stay busy. It sounds sad, sure, but he’d go on to say he feels useless and worthless if he just sits around, getting nothing done. He WANTS to be busy. He doesn’t do it for money, though he does collect a paycheck. He does it for fulfillment.

Meanwhile, FCA/PSA is probably posting openings as some of its Challenger/Charger workers enjoyed a full career and are now entering retirement, having worked majority of their 40+ year career building the same damn model. From the listing (probably): “Looking for craftsmen/women skilled in circa 2001 techniques for

No. This is less attractive than the Yukon. Lincoln’s designers easily outdid this, but Cadillac will likely continue to rule the sales charts.

Well....this and online dating.

A) I don’t have a truck and didn’t defend any truck-buying people, much less those who adorn their pickups with tacky accessories. I drive a RWD sedan.

Sure. Do we need repeat articles about it? Even a shit article like this one, wherein the author is trying to acknowledge something good in GM’s decision-making, is laced with backhanded compliments. It’s trite. Despite several authors, there’s only one monotonous voice.

I chose “writers” over “journalists” because the latter’s standards are too high for nearly all outlets these days. 

A negative GM article on Jalopnik. And it craps on a ”big and stupid” truck, too.

Unmoved. Perfect colors on a frumpy car.

That may be the only angle where I thought the Forester was handsome. Any other, and it’s homely. Since around the debut of the Forester, it's as though Subaru insists on making unattractive vehicles (mid-00s Legacy and BRZ excluded).

Chrysler tried to hold onto this look into the 90s.

Meh. Why should we care about it?

Eh... The series pretty much died when $kaykog retired the long-time bimbo awards in the COTD comments. Comments on the COTD articles dropped off precipitously, which I imagine meant fewer page visits. That was months ago. Lame COTD awards during that time didn’t help. It’s not worth the effort to publish them anymore.